Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  LABORATORY ANTHROPOLOGY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The text is in the form of a dialogue between a professor representing the Actor-Network Theory and a doctor's degree candidate whose tutor has suggested to him that he applied the approach in his research. A talk is, then, one between an expert (in a given area) and a layman. Such a structure enables the staging of going through a variety of misunderstandings arising around the Theory and some typical accusations charged against it. The first to tackle were the troubles with the name itself and the improper use of the term 'theory'. Then came the question of understanding what a tool is; juxtaposing the frame (as a context) with a description; objectivity and empiricism and relativism at the same time; text approached as a social sciences laboratory. The notion of 'actor' made opposite to a marionette controlled by social forces, thus being an informer only, is discussed at more length. Along with those, accompanying issues appear of information as trans-formation, invisibility of actors and their criticality and reflexivity.
EN
This text has two goals: the first is to present the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) as elaborated by Bruno Latour, and the second, to provide a context for understanding some of the problems touched upon in the Prologue in the form of a dialogue between a student and his (somewhat) Socratic Professor. Since the question how ANT differs from other theoretical approaches is of essence to both, the author points out to the originality of the Theory's resolutions whilst emphasising how it may differ against its alternative approaches. ANT is rooted in the laboratory anthropology current, hence its attachment to a meticulous empirical description. Therefore, having raised issues traditionally being a domain of philosophy of science or sociology, ANT has contributed its own unique perspective and resolutions, enabling an innovative method of perceiving the relatedness between cognitional practices (science) and politics.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.