Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: LITERARY MAGAZINES

Sort By:

Limit search:

KRITICKÉ ČÍTANIE SLOVENSKEJ VOJVODINSKEJ LITERATÚRY NA SLOVENSKU V DRUHEJ POLOVICI 20. A ZAČIATKOM 21. STOROČIA

100%

Svetlík A.

Slovenská literatúra (Slovak Literature)

2016

vol. 63

issue 4

235 – 262

The paper focuses on the analysis of literary critical reception of Slovak Vojvodina literature in Slovakia written in the second half of the 20th century and the early 21th century. It examines the literary critical articles written by Slovak authors that were published in Slovakia´s literary magazines (Slovenské pohľady, Slovenská literatúra, Romboid etc.) and also partly in the Slovak magazine Nový život published in Serbia, as well as in some critics´ compilation books. The great emphasis is placed on the reconstruction of the causes, the methods and the pace of, as well as the people involved in restoring the severed relations between the two forms of the same literature, i.e. that written in Slovak language, while what is mainly analysed is the changes in the status of Slovak Vojvodina literature (from that in the region to that in the enclave) and their impact on the relations between Slovak Vojvodina literature and all-Slovakia literature. Close attention is paid to the authors who did or have done literary critical research into Slovak Vojvodina literature in the most systematic way (Peter Andruška, Viliam Marčok, Dalimír Hajko, Oliver Bakoš, Etela Farkašová) and who did or have done their share in the full integration of Slovak Vojvodina literature into the all-Slovakia literary context.

CENZÚRA NA SLOVENSKU V DRUHEJ POLOVICI PÄŤDESIATYCH ROKOV (AKTÉRI A VYBRANÉ DOKUMENTY)

88%

Matejovič P.

Slovenská literatúra (Slovak Literature)

2015

vol. 62

issue 1

15 – 33

The study focuses on the second half of the 1950s, which is generally seen as a period of political thaw, following the 20th Congress of the CPSU, which had impact on culture, too. However, underneath the phoney „liberalization“ there were still trials going on, which was more or less a continuation of the Stalinist methods of managing culture in the first half of the 1950s. Imposing censorship, i.e. establishing the Head Office of Press Supervision by the government decree of 22 April 1953 can be perceived within this context. The censorship office was established as „non-public“ in order to have a more effective control system, which was supposed to act as a form of „creative leadership“, i.e. not only to ban but also to fulfil the didactic function. The study also analyses the censor commentaries as an autonomous „genre“; reading by a censor often looked like a review composed in the manner of normative ideological instructions. The Office of Press Supervision directed its attention to literary magazines (Kultúrny život, Mladá tvorba) as well as the production of certain poets and writers (the Concretists, Vladimír Mináč, Anton Hykisch, Dominik Tatarka, Milan Rúfus, Ivan Mojík etc.). The power control of culture after February 1948 was not only executed by means of the censorship office but also by other institutional mechanisms (laws, organizations, appointed editors).

Refine search results

2 Slovenská literatúra (Slovak Literature)

1 Matejovič P.

1 Svetlík A.

1 2016

1 2015

Search results

KRITICKÉ ČÍTANIE SLOVENSKEJ VOJVODINSKEJ LITERATÚRY NA SLOVENSKU V DRUHEJ POLOVICI 20. A ZAČIATKOM 21. STOROČIA

CENZÚRA NA SLOVENSKU V DRUHEJ POLOVICI PÄŤDESIATYCH ROKOV (AKTÉRI A VYBRANÉ DOKUMENTY)