Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Leib
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Problem umysł-ciało-ciało

100%
Thompson E., Hanna R.
Avant
|
2012
|
vol. 3
|
issue T
14-37
EN
Robert Hanna and Evan Thompson offer a solution to the Mind-Body-Body Problem. The solution, in a nutshell, is that the living and lived body (Leib) is metaphysically and conceptually basic, in the sense that one’s consciousness, on the one hand, and one’s corporeal being (Körper), on the other, are nothing but dual aspects of one’s lived body. One’s living and lived body can be equated with one’s being as an animal; therefore, this solution to the Mind-Body-Body Problem amounts to an “animalist” version of the dual aspect theory.
2

Fenomenologia ucieleśniona (embodied phenomenology) a teza o tożsamości psychofizycznej

81%
Kąkol T.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2020
|
issue 69
37-72
PL
Przedstawiciele tzw. fenomenologii ucieleśnionej sprawiają wrażenie, że bronią tezy o tożsamości psychofizycznej. Po argumentacji za nieredukowalnością ja – wyróżniam fenomenologicznie tzw. pole czuciowe i ciało rozumiane jako Koerper, wskazując, że utożsamienie tych trzech elementów nie jest wystarczająco uzasadnione, przynajmniej na gruncie fenomenologii.
EN
Phenomenologists inspired by the embodiment approach seem to subscribe to the psychophysical identity thesis. I argue that I (ego) cannot be eliminated and I differentiate phenomenologically between the sensory field and the body understood as a Koerper holding that the identification of those three items as “in fact one and the same” is not sufficiently warranted, at least on phenomenological grounds.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O rzeczywistości ciała ludzkiego

58%
Płoszczyniec A., Wrocławski U.
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
|
2016
|
vol. 35 (4)
EN
“Body” is here understood prima facie as biological, organic body (Körper). This article claims, that ignoring this aspect of human being is wrong, because many important anthropological and existential phenomena are based on reality of Körper, not only Leib. “Reality” of human body is understood as a constitutive element of a human being’s essence, without which one cannot be a human. First were presented Heidegger’s critique of philosophical anthropology and concept of animalitas. According to the author of Being and Time, referring to biological corporeality is secondary to fundamental ontology. This article criticizes Heidegger and claims, that many phenomena indicated by him are primary understandable only by paying attention to organic dimension of human body, dimension underestimated by Heidegger. Then, a number of „existentialist” aspects of human life were presented, and their consideration confirms that it is impossible to gain insight on a human if his corporeal dimension is ignored.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.