Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Marcin Bielski’s idiolect
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Koheletowa "marność" według Marcina Bielskiego na tle wybranych XVI-wiecznych przekładów biblijnych

100%
Kozaryn D.
Świat i Słowo
|
2022
|
vol. 39
|
issue 2
105-116
EN
"Vanity" in the Ecclesiastes according to Marcin Bielski against the background of selected 16th‑century biblical translations The article concerns a selected aspect of the translation of the Book of Ecclesiastes by Marcin Bielski and included in the Kronika wszytkiego świata (1554) and the Kronika, to jest historyja świata (1564). The meanings were compared with the ways of speaking about vanity in other 16th-century translations of the Book of Ecclesiastes (Hieronim z Wielunia, Biblia Leopolity, Biblia brzeska, Biblia nieświeska, Biblia Jakuba Wujka) and the Vulgate. The conducted analysis showed the lack of a confessional justification for the choice of the lexeme vanity in Bielski’s translation.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O czym nie napisał Marcin Bielski, czyli o pewnym rodzaju uwag metatekstowych w Kronice, to jest historyi świata (1564)

63%
Kozaryn D.
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica
|
2020
|
issue 15
145-153
EN
The article discusses a selected group of metatextual comments made in the 3rd edition of Marcin Bielski’s Kronika published in 1564. The analysis focuses on those referring to the contents of his Chronicle, i.e. the comments informing about what Bielski has already written and where he has written it, what he is about to mention, what and for what reason has been omitted or added by the author when compared to his sources, and what he has only treated superficially. A review of the variety of the linguistic methods used for constructing these metatextual comments allows for disclosing the possible motivations behind the writer’s choices: his wish to direct the reading process and to lead the reader into assuming that the presented content is credible and accurate, combined with an educational and moralistic drive.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.