Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Max Stirner
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pobożny ateista Ludwik Feuerbach. Krytyka Maksa Stirnera

100%
Uglik J.
Przegląd Religioznawczy
|
2019
|
issue 1/271
EN
Feuerbach argued that God is not the creator of man, but man is the creator of God. It led him to the conclusion that the secret of theology is anthropology. According to Stirner, Feuerbach proposes, at most, formal reclassification of concepts, still being a religious thinker, because he deifies the species-understood Man. The article is devoted to Stirner’s criticism of Feuerbach and polemic with researchers who perceive Stirner as an amoralistic antihumanist.
2
Content available remote

František Sedlák: mezi anarchismem, tolstojovstvím a hegeliánstvím

89%
Landa I.
Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)
|
2022
|
vol. 70
|
issue 2
319-339
EN
The article focuses on the conception of absolute idealism elaborated by Czech Hegelian František Sedlák. First, Max Stirner’s position of egoism is presented, as Sedlák was influenced by his critique of the conceptual vertical, i.e. of the subsumption of the individual under abstractions. Second, it examines how Sedlák employed such critique in resolving the so-called “paradox of authority.” Third, it sketches both Sedlák’s reception and critique of Tolstoyanism, at whose conceptual core he encountered a problem associated with conception of abstract morality, which he criticized at first from the standpoint of Stirnerian egoism, later from the standpoint of Hegelian absolute idealism. Finally, Sedlák’s conception of absolute idealism as a philosophy of existence is reconstructed.
CS
Článek se zabývá koncepcí absolutního idealismu českého hegeliána Františka Sedláka. Nejprve je představeno stanovisko egoismu Maxe Stirnera, neboť Sedláka ovlivnila jeho kritika konceptuální vertikály, tj. podřízenosti individua abstrakcím. Ve druhém kroku autor sleduje, jak Sedlák tuto kritiku využívá při řešení tzv. „paradoxu autority“. Následně je přiblížen Sedlákův příklon k tolstojovství, v jehož jádru však Sedlák záhy naráží na obtíže související s tolstojovským pojetím abstraktní morality. Sedlák s ním polemizuje nejprve ze stanoviska stirnerovského egoismu, později absolutního idealismu a hegeliánství. V závěrečném kroku je nakonec představena Sedlákova koncepce absolutního idealismu jako filosofie existence.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nihilizm a kwestia przemocy: casus Maxa Stirnera

89%
Feć K., Jagielloński U.
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
|
2016
|
vol. 35 (4)
EN
The paper presents a relation between nihilism and violence by using the theory of Max Stirner. The author’s choice of the philosopher is driven by her view that nihilism has reached its maturity in his main work. Even more, a key critique raised with respect to the author of "The Ego and his Own" touched exactly on the issue of violence (among others, in deliberations of Dostoyevsky and Camus). The study represents a polemic with the opinions presented in "The Rebellious Man", that Stirner glorified aggression and justified crime. Misreading of his philosophy, the philosophy of egoism, is founded in mixing might with violence which in fact are in that theory irreconcilable. Stirner's affirmation refers to the former whereas he is ambivalent to the latter.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.