Search results

1

Spółki handlowe a znowelizowana ustawa o kształtowaniu ustroju rolnego – uwagi z praktyki notarialnej

100%

Muszalska M.

Studia Prawa Publicznego

|

2020

|

issue 4 (32)

63-86

EN

The article deals with the problems encountered by commercial companies and their partners related to applying the provisions of the Act of 11 April 2003 on the structuring of the agricultural system following the amendment to this Act, which came into force on 26 June 2019. These problems concern the acquisition of agricultural real estate by commercial companies and the disposal of shares and stocks in capital companies already owning such real estate. In the latter case, issues relating to the State Treasury’s (the National Agricultural Support Centre) pre-emptive right and the right to acquire shares and stakes are analysed. The problems here relate mainly to the new procedure introduced by the amendment in question, including new obligations for the company’s management board. Furthermore, there is a discussion of the right of the State Treasury to acquire real estate of partnerships in the event of a change of partner or the accession of a new partner to such a company, as well as the new right to acquire the real estate of a company whose shares are permitted for organised trading. The study advances the thesis that while several facilitating measures have been introduced regarding the acquisition of agricultural real estate by commercial companies, the procedure related to the sale of shares of these companies has been complicated and prolonged to a significant degree. An obligation has been imposed on the management board of a company to collect numerous written documents and send them to the National Centre when the latter has the pre-emptive right or the right to purchase shares or stocks. This impacts negatively on the legal situation of the shareholder whose rights are transferred due to the lack of a deadline by which the company’s management board should submit the agreement to the National Centre. At the same time, the new procedure significantly lengthens the proceedings, generates costs and, above all, is completely unnecessary, as most documents are available in an electronic form. The National Centre also has access to the remaining documents. The new regulations have equipped it with the authority to inspect the books and documents of the company whose shares are being sold.

2

Formy zagospodarowania mienia Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa po zmianie przepisów z 2016 roku

82%

Suchoń A.

Przegląd Prawa Rolnego

|

2018

|

issue 2(23)

13-30

IT

L’articolo si propone di determinare l’impatto che i cambiamenti apportati alle regolazioni giuridiche, specie quelli introdotti dalla legge del 14 aprile 2016 sulla sospensione della vendita di beni immobili appartenenti all’Agenzia fondiaria agricola Tesoro di Stato, hanno avuto sulle forme di gestione del suo patrimonio. Si tratta in particolare di determinare quale di queste forme prevalga nonché il contesto giuridico in cui esse funzionano. L’Autrice fa tra l’altro notare un’importanza minore attribuita alla vendita di beni immobili appartenenti all’Agenzia fondiaria agricola Tesoro di Stato rispetto agli anni 2009–2014 nonché un crescente aumento dei terreni agricoli in affitto. Pertanto, la modifica legislativa in esame ha permesso di rafforzare il ruolo che l’affitto stesso assume nei rapporti agricoli. L’Autrice osserva inoltre che il Centro nazionale per il sostegno agricolo gode di maggiori diritti in caso di vendita di immobili agricoli appartenenti all’Agenzia fondiaria agricola Tesoro di Stato, non solo prima, ma anche dopo la conclusione del contratto. Questa istituzione è anche attiva nell’esercitare il diritto di prelazione nel campo dell’acquisto di quote o azioni in società proprietarie degli immobili agricoli.

EN

The aim of the author of the article was to determine the impact of the amendments to the legal regulations, especially those introduced by the Act of 14 April 2016 on suspending the sale of real estate from the State Treasury Agricultural Property Stock, on the forms of property development. In particular, it is to determine which of these forms dominate and to indicate the legal conditions related to their functioning. Among other things, it has been noted the sale of the property from the State Treasury Agricultural Property Stock has significantly decreased in comparison with the years 2009–2014, while the area of agricultural land being leased is growing. The amendments to the regulations have therefore strengthened the role of leasing in rural relations. Moreover, the National Agricultural Support Centre enjoys greater rights when selling agricultural property from the State Treasury Agricultural Property Stock, not only before but also after the contract of sale is finalised. The same is true when it comes to the exercise of the pre-emption right to acquire shares in companies owing agricultural property.

PL

Celem artykułu jest określenie wpływu zmian w przepisach prawa, w szczególności wprowadzonych ustawą z 14 kwietnia 2016 r. o wstrzymaniu sprzedaży nieruchomości z Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa, na formy rozwój nieruchomości, a w szczególności określenie, które z tych form dominują, oraz wskazanie uwarunkowań prawnych związanych z ich funkcjonowaniem. Odnotowano m.in. znaczny spadek sprzedaży nieruchomości z Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa w porównaniu z latami 2009–2014, przy jednoczesnym wzroście powierzchni dzierżawionych gruntów rolnych. Zmiany przepisów wzmocniły więc rolę leasingu w stosunkach z obszarami wiejskimi. Ponadto Krajowy Ośrodek Wsparcia Rolnictwa ma większe uprawnienia przy sprzedaży nieruchomości rolnej ze Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa nie tylko przed, ale także po zawarciu umowy sprzedaży. To samo dotyczy wykonywania prawa pierwokupu udziałów w spółkach posiadających majątek rolny.

3

Szczególne obowiązki umowne nabywcy nieruchomości z Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa

73%

Michałowski R.

Studia Iuridica

|

2018

|

vol. 78

315-332

PL

The Act on Management of Agricultural Property Stock of the State Treasury contains a regulation on contractual obligations imposed on the purchaser of an agricultural property acquired from the Agricultural Property Stock of the State Treasury. These obligations are not imposed on the purchaser by operation of law, however, there is a requirement that they have to be included, in certain cases of acquisition detailed in the provisions of the Act, in the content of the real estate sales agreement. The sales agreement has to stipulate that the purchaser is prohibited from selling the real estate for a period of 15 years from its acquisition; the purchaser is obliged to conduct agricultural activity on the purchased property; and that during this period, the purchaser may not encumber the property with any mortgage. Any violation of the aforementioned stipulations shall result in the purchaser’s obligation to pay an amount equal to 40% of the property’s sale price. In addition, the legislator has introduced the obligation to pay this amount in the event that the purchaser makes any false statement or representation as to the origin of the funds allocated to the purchase of the real estate. The provisions relating to the issues raised in the article cause a number of interpretative doubts as to their correct understanding. In particular, this applies to the legal nature of the obligation to pay an amount equal to 40% of the price of the purchased real estate property.

4

Kształtowanie jednolitej wspólnej regulacji rynków rolnych w Unii Europejskiej i Polsce

58%

Osdoba W.

Studia Iuridica

|

2017

|

vol. 72

295-308

PL

Pending the entry into force of the Common Agricultural Organization of Agricultural Markets in 2007, there were twenty one coexisting industry market organizations as defined in the relevant basic EU regulations. Merging in one legal act the provisions of several dozen other EU regulations and looking at the single European market in a holistic and not sectoral way, illustrates the current way of running the Common Agricultural Policy, which seeks to comprehensively address the problems of the European agricultural market. From 1st September 2017, there has been a National Support Center for Agriculture, which took over the tasks of two liquidated agencies: the Agricultural Property Agency and the Agricultural Market Agency. Adaptation of the Polish legislation within the framework of agricultural policy will have to take into account the changes taking place in the Common Agricultural Policy in the future. From 1st October 2017, the sugar-producing quota system which existed for the last 50 years, setting the limits for individual Member States of the European Union, was terminated. This was the last system of agricultural quotas within the European Union. Following the harmonization of the Polish legislation with European standards, we are aware of the fact that the EU law is constantly facing changes.

Refine search results

2 Studia Iuridica

1 Przegląd Prawa Rolnego

1 Studia Prawa Publicznego

1 Michałowski R.

1 Muszalska M.

1 Osdoba W.

1 Suchoń A.

1 2020

1 2019

2 2018

Spółki handlowe a znowelizowana ustawa o kształtowaniu ustroju rolnego – uwagi z praktyki notarialnej

Formy zagospodarowania mienia Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa po zmianie przepisów z 2016 roku

Szczególne obowiązki umowne nabywcy nieruchomości z Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa

Kształtowanie jednolitej wspólnej regulacji rynków rolnych w Unii Europejskiej i Polsce