Search results

1

Dyskusja.

100%

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1977

|

issue 1-2

50

EN

In the course o f discussion the participants in the conference pointed to many aspects o f conservation activities carried out within the area o f Ogrodzieniec Castle as well as that o f other monuments classed into the group o f preserved ruins. Emphasis was laid on the a character of Polish conservation proceedings, consisting in a skillful adaptation o f English methods to the conditions prevailing in this country. The speakers making their statements in the discussion approved o f the concept o f ruins as an element o f historical monuments.

2

Projekt adaptacji ruiny zamku ogrodzienieckiego dla potrzeb turystycznych

100%

Łopatowa W.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1977

|

issue 1-2

46-48

EN

The author describes the project aimed i.a. at tracing tourist routes within the Castle, constructing premises for the guides, sanitation, booking office, porter’s lodge and also at organizing a lapidarium. The next problem discussed is that o f conservation technological solutions, e.g. the mode in which the courtyard has been prepared for tourist traffic. The sight-seeing route depicted as well, the author expounds the view that the project put into effect is consonant with the adopted conservators’ concept.

3

Studium zagospodarowania przestrzennego rejonu wsi Podzamcze

100%

Tomaszewska E.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1977

|

issue 1-2

48-50

EN

Due to its situation in the neighbourhood o f the ruins o f Ogrodzieniec Castle, and convenient transport connections, the village o f Podzamcze makes one o f the tourist centres o f Jurassic Landscape Park. The author deals with the plans for the development o f the region concerned for recreational purposes and points to the actitivities which should be eliminated therefrom, e.g. exploitation of the local quarry. Zones with different landscape values have been singled out in the plan and the directives laid down for their development in consonance with the requirements o f the protection o f landscape in the broad sense o f the term.

4

Wstępne wyniki badań architektoniczno-historycznych zamku ogrodzienieckiego

100%

Gruszecki A.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1977

|

issue 1-2

44-45

EN

The author describes in brief the findings o f historical research and field work carried out at Ogrodzieniec. The history o f the 15th century Castle o f Ogrodzieniec is described in outline, with special emphasis laid on the changes occurring in its architectonic mass. In this connection mention is made of the general expansion of the Castle (1532—1547) started by Seweryn Boner (the northern wing, the well, tower, gatehouse chained bridge, etc.) and carried on until the end o f the 16th century. The author also describes the Castle rooms dating from that time and makes an attempt at reproduction o f their Renaissance decoration.

5

Realizacje konserwatorskie przy ruinach zamków i strażnic w katowickiej części Jury Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej

75%

Kudła A.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1977

|

issue 1-2

28-30

EN

The historical outline o f Cracow—Częstochowa upland is followed by a description o f the types o f the castles in that region and their history which ended with the Swedish invasion o f Poland in the 17th century. The work on conservation o f the ruins o f the said castles was taken up after the conclusion o f the Second World War in 1945. However, the proceedings involved were not connected then with architectonic research. It was but the comprehensive work on preservation o f the ruins o f Ogrodzieniec Castle that has pointed to the correct direction o f conservation o f the castles in the Cracow—Częstochowa upland. The author deals with the scope o f that work approached from the viewpoint o f organization o f conservation proceedings. The ruins o f Ogrodzieniec Castle were made open to the public in 1973. It was then that the problem arose o f maintaining that historical monument in due condition. Hence, the need for its manager who would ensure to it a systematic and adequate protection.

6

KONSERWACJA RUIN HISTORYCZNYCH UWAGI O METODZIE

75%

Tajchman J.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

2005

|

issue 4

27-46

EN

The conservation of historical ruins is one of the most difficult domains of the protection of monuments of architecture. Unique methods were conceived relatively early on in England. The presented article is an attempt at a methodic description of the course of work intent on making ruins open to society, after the introduction of suitable protection as well as those ventures which would prolong their existence. Work is based on a complete examination of the ruins and their assessment, together with the directives of the Venice Charter (article15 ) : “Ruins must be maintained and measures necessary for the permanent conservation and protection of architectural features and of objects discovered must be taken. Furthermore, every means must be taken to facilitate the understanding of the monument and to reveal it without ever distorting its meaning. All reconstruction work should however be ruled out ‘a priori’. Only anastylosis, that is to say, the reassembling of existing but dismembered parts can be permitted. The material used for integration should always be recognizable and its use should be the least that will ensure the conservation of a monument and the reinstatement of its form”. The first stage of the undertakings should include initial reconnaissance of the ruins; studies, including archaeological and protection, and producing documentation; the assessment of type ruins from their viewpoint of their historical, artistic, emotional and picturesque qualities. The second stage consists of arriving at a general conception of the “reanimation” of the ruins by granting them a new role and planning their total protection. The final stage involves making a detailed programme and its realisation for the sake of the ruins, their background and surrounding. A detailed programme focused on ruins must take into consideration the necessity of limiting socalled consecutive supplements, usually caused by the following factors: - preparing the ruins for sightseeing, which results in outlining protected excursion routes, - construction reinforcement and the conservation of the substance of permanent ruins, with emphasis on the wall face and coping as well as the proper drainage of the whole premise, - the process of rendering the ruins legible (so-called interpretation supplementation) for the sake of a correct comprehension of the original structure and function, - display of the extracted details (lapidaries), - rendering the ruins more attractive, e. g. thanks to son et lumiere spectacles, - limiting the introduction of new functions into the ruins. The final shape of the conserved ruins is determined by the authentic substance, the manner and scope of the addition of necessary supplements as well as the preservation of the picturesque qualities of the monument. Authentic substance. The protection and conservation of ruins should serve the preservation and presentation of their authentic state. In the case of a stratified monument, the decisive role is played by an evaluation analysis. A monument which has preserved its original elements, i.e. the authentic substance, produces emotional experiences associated with history and possesses the merit of a document. This is the reason why the restoration of ruins cannot diminish the authentic substance. Scope of addition. All work involving ruins must take into account the proportions between that which is original and that which has been added. After the completion of suitable work the original elements should remain dominant. This is the reason why, for example, the scope of additional walls should remain limited to a minimum and can stem from technical reasons and the interpretation conception. Manner of addition. The added elements should be, on the one hand, legible, and, on the other hand, be integrated with the historical ruins according to the recommendations of the Venice Charter. The preservation of picturesque qualities. As a rule ruins are the most picturesque prior to conservation. Necessary work, even conducted with greatest possible piety, sometimes results in a certain “rigidity” of the preserved substance, which in time becomes alleviated by the impact of atmospheric factors. For this reason, while remaining well aware of the threats posed to the picturesque qualities of the ruins, we should aim at limiting all activity which produces such effects.

7

Zamek w Ogrodzieńcu

63%

Strzelecki W.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1951

|

issue 3-4

133-149

8

Dawna linia obronna jury krakowsko-częstochowskiej: problemy konserwacji i adaptacji dla turystyki

51%

Bogdanowski J.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1964

|

issue 4

3-36

FR

La chaîne rocheuse des montagnes du Ju ra de Cracovie—Częstochowa constituait depuis un temps immémorial, une région de défense naturelle. y retro u v e des dispositifs de défense érigés depuis l ’âge de la p ie rre ju sq u ’à la derniere guerre mondiale. Les recherches scientifiques commencées au XIX-ème siècle, poursuivies sans continuité, ainsi que de récents tra v a u x plus complexes, ont révélé dans cette région l ’existence de plus de 100 postes de défense provenant de diverses époques. On peut les classer en trois groupes d’orientation: préhistorique, médiéval et moderne. Ces trois grands groupes accusent beaucoup d ’affinités et de continuité dans l’utilisation des formes de défense, p o u rtan t spécifiques. Dans le premier groupe se manifeste surtout le système défensif des murailles sans tours, la ligne de défense infléchie et concave et les débuts originaux de l ’enceinte flanquée de tours. Dans le groupe médiéval qui relève su rto u t des dispositifs de défense érigés au XIV s. en grande p a rt p a r le roi Casimir le Grand, on voit cinq types de château aux formes nettement différenciées. Les siècles suivants apportent le développement du système donjonné et le système des bastilles, le XVlI-ème s. la formation d ’une nouvelle ligne de défense avec des bastions. Etan t donné la grande valeur de ces reliques historiques et la ncn-rmoindre valeur d u paysage ainsi conçu, les trav a u x de conservation qui les concernent doivent être organisés d’une façon complexe, dirigés p a r un groupe de spécialistes, qui s ’occuperait en même temps de la rep a rtitio n des trav au x , des fouilles au point de vue des valeurs historiques e t des valeurs du paysage ayant pour but d’établir un catalogue et inventaire des monuments historiques soumis aux investigations. P a r suite, se b asant sur les renseignements complétés, de la sorte on pourra it établir un plan général e t la repa rtition des trav a u x pour chaque oeuvre d’a rt défensif. Tenant compte de l ’é ta t actuel des monuments historiques conservés, su rto u t de l ’état des ruines, ii semble que les conservateurs devraient su rto u t pro- • téger e t consolider la substance des monuments dans la mesure du possible, plutôt que les reconstruire et re stau re r. Il est aussi d’une importance capitale de garder la silhouette de l’oeuvre, ainsi que l’entourage du monument authentique. Les trav au x de conservation, entrepris dernièrement d ’une façon intempestive, n ’ont pas toujours suivi la voie requise. L ’adaptation de l’ensemble en question aux besoins de la vie contemporaine constitue un problème à part. En règle générale, l’adaptation doit s ’effectuer surtout pour des buts de récréation e t du tourisme, au bénéfice des régions voisines urbanisées, ou trop industrialisées. Il fau t aussi envisager la protection du te rra in contre une trop intense et nuisible exploitation superficielle (carrières de chaux et sablières), contre une industrialisation du te rra in trop poussée. Ce problème doit etre posé sur deux plans différents: — il fau t reconnaître un te rra in limité comme „reserve de paysage protégé” e t in stitu e r un réseau de communication (voie périphérique) et de services n é cessaires, — il fau t aussi ren d re accessibles les monuments historiques respectifs tenant pour règle de les garder en un é ta t aussi authentique que possible, ainsi que tout ce qui forme leur entourage, par consequent expulser les services et les voies d’accès su r l’av an t-terrain .

Refine search results

8 Ochrona Zabytków

1 Bogdanowski J.

1 Gruszecki A.

1 Kudła A.

1 Strzelecki W.

1 Tajchman J.

1 Tomaszewska E.

1 Łopatowa W.

1 2005

5 1977

1 1964

1 1951

Dyskusja.

Projekt adaptacji ruiny zamku ogrodzienieckiego dla potrzeb turystycznych

Studium zagospodarowania przestrzennego rejonu wsi Podzamcze

Wstępne wyniki badań architektoniczno-historycznych zamku ogrodzienieckiego

Realizacje konserwatorskie przy ruinach zamków i strażnic w katowickiej części Jury Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej

KONSERWACJA RUIN HISTORYCZNYCH UWAGI O METODZIE

Zamek w Ogrodzieńcu

Dawna linia obronna jury krakowsko-częstochowskiej: problemy konserwacji i adaptacji dla turystyki