Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Přemysl Pitter
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
By providing the genuinely new „networked“ understanding of exile, this study aims to rewrite significantly the story of Czechoslovak political emigration and re-assess its functioning mostly by means of a tool so far ignored in this field: The Social Network Analysis. According to the dominant historiographical narrative, the Czechoslovak exile followed mostly political goals and was structured as an hierarchy with the Council of Free Czechoslovakia being the supreme body initially respected by most (though not by all) fractions within the exile movement across the globe. That is why the historical research, rather one-sidedly, focused upon the institutional history, biographies of political leaders and ideological debate within political parties in exile. The study argues that the traditional approach needs a substantial revision. Though initially designed as a state-like hierarchy with pyramidal decision-making procedures (with coordinating power vested in the Council of Free Czechoslovakia) the exile soon transformed itself into a horizontal and rather informal network of loosely interconnected and mutually collaborating units and individuals across the globe. The „network thesis“ is demonstrated upon the model analysis of František Váňa’s and Přemysl Pitter’s communication webs being part of the long-term research of Czechoslovak exile networks, 1948–1989.
EN
The Czech Republic lies in the middle of Europe. This has resulted in contact with a number of neighboring countries and Czech teachers had to teach not only Czech childrenIntercultural education in the Czech Republic in the work of social educationalists Přemysl Pitter and Miroslav Dĕdič. In the field of intercultural education, two personalities excelled in the Czech Republic: Přemysl Pitter (1895-1976) and Miroslav Dědič (1925). Přemysl Pitter focused on Czech, Jewish and German children, Miroslav Dědič on Czech, German, Slovak and especially Romany children. In our text we present research of Czech students’ opinions on both personalities and the content and meaning of their intercultural education.
PL
Autorzy artykułu przedstawiają wyniki badania opinii czeskich studentów na temat znaczenia filozofii czeskich pedagogów społecznych i andragogów dla ich przyszłej pracy zawodowej. Wskazują na to, że w dziedzinie edukacji międzykulturowej w Czechach wyróżniały się dwie osobistości: Přemysl Pitter (1895-1976) i Miroslav Dědič (1925). Přemysl Pitter koncentrował się na edukacji dzieci czeskich, żydowskich i niemieckich, Miroslav Dědič na edukacji dzieci czeskich, niemieckich, słowackich, a zwłaszcza romskich. Badania pokazują dość pozytywny związek studentów z wielokulturowym wymiarem filozofii wychowania i etyki wychowania obu pedagogów w stosunku do dzieci różnych narodowości. Autorzy postulują rozwój edukacji międzykulturowej zarówno w Czechach, jak i w Europie i na świecie w oparciu o myśli pedagogów nie tylko tych przywoływanych w tekście, ale i innych, np. Janusza Korczaka.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.