Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  PERSONS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Environmental preference is generally defined as the inverse function, which causes conflict and insecurity in some surroundings. In the environmental psychology, environmental preference is defined as a complex process influenced by both personality factors and objective characteristics of the environment that could be examined as a function of different levels of environmental quality across its coherence, legibility, mystery, complexity and personal relevance (familiarity). In this paper the authors analyse the specifics of personally important places of Slovak adolescents. The sample consisted of 436 students from all graduation classes of 8 regions in Slovakia. Qualitative analysis of graduation essays 'The place where I always love to return' in Slovak language identified 11 categories of personally significant places. Subsequent statistical analysis showed significant differences in the personally important places with regard to study profiling of graduates (human, technical, general, scientific, artistic and commercial) and also depending on the individual regions of Slovakia. The research findings confirm the importance of the place concept and place attachment in shaping identity in the context of globalization.
EN
In chapter 3 of 'Individuals', entitled 'Persons', Strawson argues against dualism and the no-ownership theory, and proposes instead that our concept of a person is a primitive concept. In this paper, it is argued that the basic questions that frame Strawson's discussion, and some of his main arguments and claims, are dubious. A general diagnosis of the source of these problems is proposed. It is argued that despite these problems Strawson gives an accurate and very insightful description of the way we think about ourselves, which should form the starting point for more speculative accounts of ourselves.
Filo-Sofija
|
2012
|
vol. 12
|
issue 4(19)
21-36
EN
The article aims to show that none of the today discussed positions concerning the relationship between human free will and God’s omniscience—determinism, compatibilism, molinism and libertarianian revisionism—is an adequate solution and proposes a position to some extent resembling Kant’s solution to his Third Antinomy, where he made the distinction between subject as causa phenomenon and subject as causa noumenon. God possesses not only an absolute knowledge concerning all processes and events in the world, but He also has a full knowledge concerning what all human subjects will decide to do. Nevertheless, His absolute knowledge in this sense is compatible with human freedom, because ‘real freedom’ is ‘located’—as a causality of freedom—in individual human natures which already exist in eternity and of which our actual inner experience gives us only a ‘sensual scheme’ (Kant). Human persons are tempted by different life experiences which they receive, i.e. they are tested by God and it cannot be excluded that some of these personal essences will turn out to be only illusory and in this sense will be condemned. For all other persons worldly experience was planned by God as a necessary element of their future eternal life.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.