Results found: 1

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION

Sort By:

Limit search:

DISSIMILATION OF THE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY, OR HOW DO PHILOSOPHERS DEVISE A TRADITION (Dysymiliatsia analitychnoi filosofii, abo Yak filosofy vynakhodiat' tradytsiiu)

100%

Tsyba V.

Філософська Думка

2010

issue 2

145-153

The problem of origins of the analytic philosophy is a subject of a profound intrinsic consideration among such contemporary thinkers as R. Monk. His key standpoint is that interpretative clue protracted by M. Dummett made it possible to discover a historic impetus for the whole 'linguistic movement' in Frege's thought. Monk's objection points out that the analytic philosophy was full-methodologically structured movement already defined in its strategies since the beginning. The crucial opposition between those analysts who declared logic as a vehicle for a metaphilosophical position and those who considered it were the final aim of its development was exposed in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Although the patterns of reconsidering the method-validity problem became the point of self-identification for analysts, which then established two traditions - logical and linguistic analysis - instead of the former one, the real core within this tradition was not 'the linguistic turn' but, namely, the variety of possibilities of the analysis. The author's opinion is that a devising of any kind of tradition is a way to sum up and outline its perspectives; hereby it needs such a rewriting which would productively include each of alternatives into assessment of its own historic self-reflections.

Refine search results

1 Філософська Думка

1 Tsyba V.

1 2010

Search results

DISSIMILATION OF THE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY, OR HOW DO PHILOSOPHERS DEVISE A TRADITION (Dysymiliatsia analitychnoi filosofii, abo Yak filosofy vynakhodiat' tradytsiiu)