Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 3 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Authors help

  1. 3 Šajda P.

Years help

  1. 1 2020

  2. 2 2015

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  PHILOSOPHY OF EXISTENCE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

SPOR O INTERPRETÁCIU 19. STOROČIA. POZNÁMKY CARLA SCHMITTA KU KIERKEGAARDOVI A DONOSOVI CORTÉSOVI

100%
Šajda P.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2015
|
vol. 70
|
issue 4
245 -257
EN
Carl Schmitt sees the year of 1848 as the critical point of the 19th century. With reference to the events of that year the Communist line of interpretation was constituted which explains the 19th century through the prism of the continuity of the revolutionary movement’s development. The symbol of this continuity is The Communist Manifesto which connects the revolutionary events of 1848 and 1917. Against this tradition of interpretation Schmitt promotes a different line of interpretation based on an alternative continuity. Although the group of thinkers belonging to this line is relatively heterogeneous Schmitt identifies three diagnostic-prognostic moments that connect them. Included in this line are both Søren Kierkegaard and Juan Donoso Cortés, whose respective contributions he analyses. His parallel reading of these authors includes a problematic exposition of some aspects of Kierkegaard’s philosophy.
2

EXISTENCIA, SUBJEKTIVITA, ETIKA. REFLEXIA KIERKEGAARDA V NEMECKEJ A FRANCÚZSKEJ FENOMENOLÓGII

100%
Šajda P.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2020
|
vol. 75
|
issue 5
372 – 385
EN
The paper represents a contribution to a broader discussion of the relation between the phenomenological and the existential tradition. It explores the reception of Kierkegaard’s philosophy in the writings of three phenomenological authors: M. Heidegger, E. Levinas and M. Henry. Their Kierkegaard reception is the most intensive among phenomenological thinkers and focuses largely on the issues of existence and subjectivity and their ethical-religious dimension. I analyse the main motifs of this reception and point out the overlaps, contradictions and tensions between the different interpretations of Kierkegaard’s ideas. I also suggest potential topics for future research.
3

K SITUÁCII DOBY: KIERKEGAARDOVA VEREJNOSŤ A JASPERSOVA MASA

100%
Šajda P.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2015
|
vol. 70
|
issue 9
726 – 735
EN
In 1914 Theodor Haecker presented Kierkegaard to the German-speaking public as a social critic, when he published the translation of a fragment from Kierkegaard’s A Literary Review (1846). The translation inspired several influential authors of the interwar period, who commented on the condition of the society of that time. One of them was Karl Jaspers who believed that Kierkegaard’s views were more relevant in the 20th century than they were in the 19th century. In his work The Spiritual Condition of the Age (1931/1932) Jaspers adopted several motifs from Kierkegaard’s critique of society. In the present paper the author examines thematic points of intersection of Kierkegaard’s reflections on the public and Jaspers’ reflections on the mass. He elucidates also Kierkegaard’s and Jaspers’ views on excellence, envy, levelling and modern media. Both thinkers provide original and incisive analyses of the decadent features of modern society.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.