Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  POLITICAL LIBERALISM
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Before the concept of a liberal society arose, the conviction dominated that a condition for peaceful coexistence and cooperation was a common religion, moral doctrine or philosophy. Liberalism shows that the cohesive factor in society does not have to be the acceptance by all citizens of the same way of life or religion. According to John Rawls, political liberalism is characterised by the recognition of rational pluralism which involves the coexistence of various rational, disparate religious, philosophical and moral doctrines. The recognition of rational pluralism leads to the conviction that no religious, philosophical or moral doctrine can be politically privileged. Any attempt to reconcile the disparate doctrines ends in failure or is based on forcing others to accept the stronger doctrine. Political liberalism constitutes a practical attempt at answering the question: Is a lasting and just cooperation between free and equal citizens who are divided by rational philosophical, moral and religious doctrines possible?
EN
The paper deals with the public activities of the representative of the liberal political leanings, Ján Mallý Dusarov (1829 – 1902), who actively influenced the shaping of political thought in Slovakia in the 1850s to 1870s. The author presents herein four examples of Molly’s working method, which she identified as a type of the „possible“. This type of policy in the current political discourse known as the "Weberian“ phrase of politics as profession. In his public activities, J. Mallý employed an idea that the good of the people should be taken care of not only spiritually, but also through political activities. This activity should not be an exercise of power over them, but the ability to regulate their political views, and thus their actions as well. His political legacy is in many respects topical for today‘s public officials. Since he was dealing with issues of political compromise, the following recognition of him deserves our attention: a certain degree of pragmatism, flexibility and willingness to compromise in is a must real politics, otherwise even partial objectives will not be reached.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.