Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Authors help

  1. 1 Koubová A.

  2. 1 Lánský O.

Years help

  1. 2 2024

System messages
  • Session was invalidated!

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  POLY-CRISIS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

RESILIENCE AS A METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGE FOR AXEL HONNETH’S CRITICAL THEORY

100%
Lánský O.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2024
|
vol. 79
|
issue 10
1144 – 1158
EN
The objective of the study is to examine the methodological challenges that the concept of resilience presents to Axel Honneth’s social theory as a representative of contemporary Critical Theory. The study concentrates on the concept of “immanent transcendence” as a pivotal methodological framework and examines its connections to resilience theory. In this context, initially based on social-ecological analyses, resilience becomes a more critical tool for understanding and managing (coping with) the uncertainties and complexities that characterize our era of poly-crisis. The study posits that the cognitive turn associated with resilience theory can enrich the methodology of Critical Theory (in the formulation of Axel Honneth’s social theory), allowing for a deeper reflection on the limitations of our knowledge and the inevitability of uncertainty.
2

WHICH RESILIENCE? THINKING DEMOCRATIC SUBJECTIVITY IN THE POLY-CRISIS

100%
Koubová A.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2024
|
vol. 79
|
issue 10
1129 – 1143
EN
In the context of the current poly-crisis, Andreas Reckwitz suggests that instead of emphasizing progress, Western liberal democracies should cultivate resilience. The question is: which resilience? The prevailing theory of democratic resilience focuses on securing the “invariant core” of democratic institutions. This article shows why this approach is insufficient and discusses the advantages of the multi-systemic approach. Democracy is here understood as a quality of the lived relational environment and a regime with social and ethical aspirations. Developing resilience in this context means nurturing the sources of democratic subjectivity and consistently opposing the inner and institutional violations in the society. As such resilience has nothing to do with invulnerability or protection against external threats. Instead it supports the resistance against the double binds caused inside democratic regimes by the neoliberal paradigm in the name of cultivating democratic agonism and transformation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.