Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  PP
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Aim of the paper is contribution to discussion on restating the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) principles. The paper is based on an ongoing research project entitled “Impact of cooperation on success of partnerships providing social services”1. In the light of work carried out in the project, it is worth noting that government policy is positive toward PPP, although private financing is not seen as an essential part of PPP. PPP principles are considered to be conducive to innovation and cost of all life, there are also doubts about possibilities of using potential of PPP. The Polish situation indicates need for a broader look at how innovation and thinking for a lifetime can be released in PPP. The question arises whether creation of partnerships between public and private component might be a future for PPP in Poland and elsewhere.
EN
Secondary predicates are known to be hybrids. The secondary predicate warm in Jan eet die Hol­landse kroketjes warm is depending both on the VP predicate eet and on the NP die Hollandse kroketjes. It has also been indicated that a secondary predicate can be governed by some types of PP’s. Compare the direct object van die Hollandse kroketjes in Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm with the prepositional object van die Hollandse kroketjes in: *Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm. In the first sentence, ‘Jan’ eats an unlimited amount of ‘Dutch croquettes’, while what ‘Jan’ in the second sentence does is eating pieces of unlimited amount of ‘Dutch croquettes’. The difference between the acceptability of the two constructions tends to be analysed in two ways: 1. the first sentence is acceptable because the direct object is in fact not a PP but a NP, which is preceded by a complex determinator van die or 2. the construction is acceptable because it contains a PP which refers to entities. The aim of this paper is to further support the second opinion.
3
Content available remote

Dvojitá prefixace a sémantika sloves pohybu

75%
EN
In this paper, the author discusses the aspectual system of Czech and in particular, the prefix combinations in verbs. Following the arguments of Gehrke (2009) and the general model of Zwarts (2005), he argues that as upward monotone vectors, the goal prefixes 'do-' and 'pri-' cannot be modified by the measure prefix 'po-' (there are no verbs such as *po-do-skocit or *po-pri-jet). He then offers a formal treatment of paths and events homomorphism for motion verbs in Czech. Based on the examined data, the author argues in favor of keeping separate two distinctions in the aspectual system of Czech: telicity and perfectivity. The paper as a whole is dedicated to the integration of the formal treatment of Czech aspect with vector space semantics for preposition phrases and prefixes.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.