Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  PROCEDURAL LAW
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

SYSTEM OF PENAL LAW AND ITS STRUCTURE (THEORETICAL CLASSIFICATION) (System trestneho prava jeho struktura (teoreticke clenenie))

100%
Kordik M.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2008
|
vol. 91
|
issue 6
535-547
EN
The author in his contribution offers a classification of the penal law different from the traditional classification to the procedural and material parts. He has been inspired by Pratel and others who thing aloud of the 'reallocation' and new conception of the classification of the rules. The main argument is the search for the interface and the interdisciplinary character of the individual institutes of penal law such as sentence, evidence, judgement, proof, offence, facts of the case, etc. The author endeavours to support his views by argumentation of well-known theoreticians and philosophers of law, especially from the normative school (of Brno and Vienna), but he does not forget the most renowned experts in penal law, such as prof. Husar, prof. Mattern and prof. Ivor. In the end the author admits that the classification is especially the theoretical issue, but such classification might partially close the gap between material law and procedural law and hence to contribute to a closer union and better cohesion of the penal law as branch of science.
2

RÍMSKOPRÁVNE PRINCÍPY V SÚČASNOM CIVILNOM PROCESE

75%
Pavelková B.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2020
|
vol. 103
|
issue 1
42 – 52
EN
The contribution evaluates the application of the Roman law principles of the trial to the current Slovak procedural codes – Civil Dispute and Civil Non-dispute Code. It focuses on finding out whether those principles have been taken into our regulations and, if so, in what form. It is an interesting probe into both – in the Roman procedural law and in the current form of the Slovak civil process, especially with regard to the fact, that Roman law sought justice, decency and morality in procedural and substantive law as well. What is currently the main interest of the Slovak court proceedings? Is it a searching for justice, or have other priorities prevailed? Even in creating these (relatively) new Codes, the traditional struggle of natural and positive law was fought. The article evaluates the outcome of this fight (quite critically).
3

VYBRANÉ OTÁZKY PRÁVNEJ OCHRANY ZRANITEĽNÝCH DOSPELÝCH PROSTRIEDKAMI MEDZINÁRODNÉHO PRÁVA SÚKROMNÉHO – ZÁKON O MEDZINÁRODNOM PRÁVE SÚKROMNOM A PROCESNOM

75%
Ďuriš M., Burdová K.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2012
|
vol. 95
|
issue 2
164 – 172
EN
The article deals with the legal regulation of Slovak courts jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition of foreign decisions in matters of restriction or deprivation of legal capacity and guardianship in the Slovak Act on private international and procedural law. Particular attention is paid to recent changes in legislation and their consequences for Slovak nationals with habitual residence abroad.
4

ŠTATUTÁRNY ORGÁN AKO PRACOVNÍK PODĽA PRÁVA EÚ A EURÓPSKE PROCESNÉ PRÁVO

75%
Barancová H.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2020
|
vol. 103
|
issue 3
169 – 182
EN
In the paper, the author deals with the question whether a member of a statutory body may be considered as a worker / employee according to the EU law in the performance of his / her duties. Following that question, she analyses the possibilities for determining the competences and jurisdiction of the labour courts within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation, in which a natural person in the status of a worker enjoys a privileged legal status, as opposed to that of a participant in the civil and commercial matters.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.