Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny

Authors help

  1. 1 Manczak W.

Years help

  1. 1 2010

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  PROTONIC VOWEL GROUP DEVELOPMENT
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

WHY *PENDICARE - PENCHER, BUT MANDUCARE - MANGER? (Pourquoi *pendicare - pencher, mais manducare - manger?)

100%
Manczak W.
Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny
|
2010
|
vol. 57
|
issue 1
25-28
EN
In French, there is a contradiction in the change that can be exemplified by two items: *pendicare -> pencher and manducare -> manger. Hans Rheinfelder, Gaston Zink and Michael Mazzola put forward various hypotheses to reconcile how the voiced palatal could be explained for manger, but the voiceless palatal for pencher both from an original intervocalic (k). According to the present writer, pencher is regular, whereas manger is to be accounted for by what he calls irregular sound change due to frequency.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.