Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Panarion
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
|
2023
|
vol. 32
|
issue 1
11-19
EN
The article answers the question of the causes of departures from the Church in the first centuries of Christianity. The source of analysis is the Panarion, the largest patristic catalogue of heresies by Epiphanius of Salamina. The structure of the article is determined by the motives for leaving the Church: a) making too high demands on oneself and being unable to admit one’s error; b) being subjected to manipulation by others; c) being formally removed from the Church.
EN
The article deals with the issue of a child in Epiphanius of Salamis’ Panarion. The paper consists of three main parts: the first shows the meaning of childhood according to Epiphanius, the second presents the negative attitudes of heretics towards children, and in the last the Christ’s childhood is analysed. As a result of analysis we can state that according to Epiphanius 1. Childhood is an important stage in the life of every person and the human kind, and should be creatively developed. It is a mistake to try to distance oneself from the values obtained in childhood; 2. In Panarion there is no details of the childhood of heresiarchs with few exceptions; 3. The image of a child closely related to orthodox theology emerges from the pages of the catalogue of heresies. Negative attitudes towards children are related to the activities of heretics; 4. Panarion is a proof that in the first centuries, in the time of persecution and the rise of various heresies, many Christian families failed in religious education as their children did not persist in the orthodox faith in which they were raised.
PL
Artykuł podejmuje problematykę dziecka w Panarionie Epifaniusza z Salaminy. Składa się z trzech części: pierwsza ukazuje znaczenie dzieciństwa, w drugiej prezentowane są negatywne postawy sekt wobec dzieci, w ostatniej analizie poddano dzieciństwo Zbawiciela. Do najważniejszych wniosków płynących z analiz należą: 1. Dzieciństwo jest ważnym etapem w życiu pojedynczego człowieka i całej ludzkości, który należy twórczo rozwinąć. Błędem są próby odcinania się od wartości otrzymanych w dzieciństwie; 2. Brak jest w Panarionie, poza nielicznymi wyjątkami, szczegółów na temat dzieciństwa herezjarchów; 3. Z kart katalogu herezji wyłania się obraz dziecka ściśle związany z poprawną teologią. Negatywne postawy względem dzieci są związane z działalnością sekt; 4. Panarion jest dowodem na to, że w pierwszych wiekach, w epoce prześladowań i powstawania wielu herezji, wiele chrześcijańskich rodzin poniosło wychowawczą porażkę. Ich dzieci nie wytrwały w wierze, w której zostały wychowane.
EN
The Panarion treatise is a dogmatic and polemical writing that earned Epiphanius his well-deserved reputation of a zealous defender of the Orthodox faith and a “hunter of heresies”. Its list of heresies was translated into Church Slavonic during the 1st Bulgarian Empire at the time of tsar Symeon and quickly spread throughout the Slavic-Orthodox world. It is a part of the oldest Slavonic version of Syntagma of XIV titles without any commentary (Syntagma XIV titulorum sine scholiis), called Efremovskaya Kormchaya. It is a monumental compendium of the centenary heresiological literature, and is the most complete treatise on heresies that the age of the Fathers left us. The paper presents a description of the three books and seven volumes of the Panarion with a list of eighty heresies, sects and schisms – twenty heresies before the incarnation of Christ and sixty of Christian times. Within the work attributed to Epiphanius, a chapter of the Ecclesiastical History of Theodoret of Cyrus and two other chapters of the theological-philosophical work Arbiter or Umpire by Joannes Philoponus have been identified. A number of 103 heresies was revealed, all of them ascribed to Epiphanius. It is presented as a preliminary study of 140 terms used by an anonymous Slavic translator. To the various lexemes, two different criteria have been applied: grammatical and semantic. The research determines 15 ethnonyms and eponyms, 60 anthroponyms formed on the names of the heresiarchs, 30 calques from Greek and 35 compounds. Among the latter, two distinct groups have been distinguished: structural calques, exactly corresponding to the Greek models, and “neologisms”, formally independent of the Greek formations. Adaptation to the original Bulgarian linguistic system was achieved by the translator (or the editor) by using interpretative supplements, i.e. glosses. It is assumed that the translator’s primary objective was to remain as faithful as possible to the Greek original. It turns out that the translator showed excellent knowledge of the comple XGreek models of word formation and exceptional skills in adapting them to the Palaeoslavic linguistic system. The compound lexemes were created for stylistic reasons and are a result of a specific translation technique.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.