Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Pierce
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article focuses on the aspects that refer to linguistics in the works of Charles S. Peirce. His pragmatic philosophy implemented many other sciences and among them is the traditional trivium of logic, grammar, and rhetoric, which Peirce divided into different kinds of logic, grammar, and rhetoric. While the impact of the work of Peirce on theses sciences is weak, the integration of the sciences in his philosophy is interesting as a step in the history of science and his work is an example for ecclecticism and historism of science in the 19th century and the universalism of science deducted from a philosophy that uses the sign as an unitarian principle. Triple constructions are a very common feature in the writings of Peirce, and the trivium is an example of an academic construction Peirce implemented.
EN
The article analyzes the concept of morality proposed by Bekoff and Pierce in the context of animal morality in the book Wild Justice. Differences are shown in comparison to the understanding of morality in the human context. On this basis, it is suggested to use the name (proto)morality for animal behavior similar to the moral behavior of humans. Part of the article analyzes the concept of empathy used in the context of animals. The article also argues to use the third type of moral status of moral (proto)subjectivity.
PL
W artykule analizuje się pojęcie moralności zaproponowanego przez Bekoffa i Pierce w kontekście moralności zwierząt w książce Dzika sprawiedliwość. Wykazuje się różnice w porównaniu do rozumienia moralności w kontekście ludzkim. Na tej podstawie sugeruje się używanie nazwy (proto)moralność na zwierzęce zachowania zbliżone do zachowań moralnych ludzi. Część artykułu analizuje pojęcie empatii używane w kontekście zwierząt. W artykule argumentuje się też, aby używać trzeciego rodzaju moralnego statusu (proto)podmiotowości moralnej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.