Search results

1

Specyfika funkcjonowania instytucji Prezydenta w Ukrainie w kontekście rozpoczęcia pełnowymiarowej inwazji Federacji Rosyjskiej (24 lutego – 14 kwietnia 2022 r.)

100%

Karmazina M., Tsependa I.

Przegląd Sejmowy

|

2023

|

issue 2(175)

29-43

EN

This article is one of the first attempts to launch a national research aimed at understanding the activities of state authorities under extreme conditions of war. It aims primarily to identify and analyse the features of the functioning of the institution of the presidency in Ukraine during the first 50 days of the full-scale Russian aggression against Ukraine. Looking through the prism of the synergetic paradigm, using a number of research methods (real-time analysis of events, phenomena and processes, content analysis and comparative analysis) and based on the study of a number of documents (decrees, orders) approved by the signature of the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky and analysing the dominant ideas uttered by him in numerous speeches and addresses, proclaimed during the hostilities conducted on the territory of the Ukrainian state, marked by the crimes committed by the Russian aggressor, the following was identified: • a time of transformation of the institution of the presidency, which is usually seen as a result of the autonomy of the incumbent president; • the effectiveness of the institution as a centre for making political decisions in times of war in the face of increasing instability and imbalance of processes and phenomena both in the Ukrainian state and in the political environment of Europe and the world; • the ability of the institution to cooperate (with other institutions of state power, the people, and the international community) and to a high degree of self-organisation in times of war.

2

Odpowiedzialność polityczno-prawna Prezydenta Ukrainy

86%

STEC A.

Przegląd Sejmowy

|

2020

|

issue 6(161)

145-168

EN

One of the democratic mechanisms of state governance is to define the political and legal responsibilities of the supreme state bodies. The type and scope of responsibility also determines the legal and constitutional position of the head of state. In the article, the author analyzes legal norms regarding the political and legal responsibility of the President of Ukraine. The examination of problems related to these norms is based on Ukrainian and foreign constitutional and statutory solutions. Political (parliamentary) responsibility is related to the relevance, legitimacy and purposefulness of decisions made by the person holding the office of President. It is assessed by the appointing or controlling body. Although the current legal status in Ukraine does not provide for the institution of the President’s political responsibility, such solutions were present during the political changes after the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Political responsibility of the Head of State in 1991–1993 was provided by the repeatedly amended Constitution of Soviet Ukraine (of 20 April 1978, as amended in Article 114-9(3)). The constitutional responsibility of the President in Ukraine is regulated in Article 111 of the Basic Law, which states that the Head of State is responsible for treason and other crimes, without however indicating the premises or grading the social harmfulness of these prohibited acts. The discussed problems related to the triple division of power, its exercise and legitimacy appear more and more often in Ukraine, Hungary, Poland and other countries of Central and Eastern Europe, affecting the security of the entire region.

3

Parliament, Head of State and Government as Entities Forming and Implementing National Anti-Corruption Policy (through the example of Ukraine)

72%

W. Skrypniuk O., Fedorenko V.

Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem

|

2016

|

vol. 8

|

issue 4

104-121

PL

Sukces dalszego rozwoju Ukrainy jako suwerennego, niezależnego i demokratycznego państwa bardziej niż kiedykolwiek wcześniej uzależniony jest od determinacji zarówno polityków, jak i urzędników państwowych oraz poszanowania zasad społeczeństwa obywatelskiego. Jednym z najpoważniejszych zagrożeń jest korupcja, która uniemożliwia skuteczny rozwój gospodarczy, społeczny i humanitarny, spowalnia proces integracji europejskiej Ukrainy i – co nie bez znaczenia – działa na korzyść wrogów zewnętrznych państwa. Walka z korupcją jest zatem jednym z najważniejszych zadań państwa ukraińskiego. Istotne miejsce w kształtowaniu i realizacji państwowej polityki antykorupcyjnej zajmują Rada Najwyższa, prezydent i rząd Ukrainy. Parlament określa ramy prawne, głowa państwa – cel i sposób prowadzenia, zaś rząd zapewnia kompleksową realizację państwowej polityki antykorupcyjnej, w tym koordynuje działania policji i Narodowej Agencji Zapobiegania Korupcji. Podkreślić należy, że powodzenie zapobiegania i przeciwdziałania korupcji na Ukrainie w dużym stopniu zależy od efektywności współdziałania naczelnych organów państwa w zakresie tworzenia i wdrażania państwowej polityki antykorupcyjnej

EN

The success of further development of Ukraine as sovereign and independent, democratic, social, constitutional state now, more than ever earlier, depends on determination of politicians, statesmen and public employees and adherence to principles of each citizen and civil society in general in fight against the external and internal enemy. Among internal enemies of Ukraine corruption which makes impossible effective economic, social and humanitarian development of Ukraine is high on the list, slows down the European integration of Ukraine, and at the end advantageous of external foes of our state. Therefore, eradication of corruption is one of the most important functions of the Ukrainian state now. The important place in system of subjects of forming and implementation of the state anti-corruption policy belongs to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine and the Cabinet of Ukraine. So, the parliament in Ukraine creates legal including the legal framework of the state anti-corruption policy, and also participates in forming of contest committees on election of special subjects of the prevention and counteraction. The head of state in Ukraine also defines essence and the maintenance of the state anti-corruption policy in the decrees, and also participates in forming of the commissions on selection and appointments of officials of specially authorized bodies according to the prevention and counteraction of corruption, and provides independence in activity of some of these bodies. The government of Ukraine provides complex implementation of the state anti-corruption policy, has own representation in contest committees which carry out forming of specially authorized bodies of prevention and counteraction of corruption (National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, etc.), And also performs the common directorship and coordination of activity of National police of Ukraine and National Agency for Prevention of Corruption. At the same time, the success of prevention and counteraction of corruption in Ukraine depends on efficiency of interaction of the supreme bodies of the government in the field of forming and implementation of the state anti-corruption policy.

Refine search results

2 Przegląd Sejmowy

1 Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem

1 Fedorenko V.

1 Karmazina M.

1 STEC A.

1 Tsependa I.

1 W. Skrypniuk O.

1 2023

1 2020

1 2016

Specyfika funkcjonowania instytucji Prezydenta w Ukrainie w kontekście rozpoczęcia pełnowymiarowej inwazji Federacji Rosyjskiej (24 lutego – 14 kwietnia 2022 r.)

Odpowiedzialność polityczno-prawna Prezydenta Ukrainy

Parliament, Head of State and Government as Entities Forming and Implementing National Anti-Corruption Policy (through the example of Ukraine)