Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  QUANTITATIVE REASONING
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

CONFLICT-MONITORING AND THE INTUITIVE ERROR IN QUANTITATIVE REASONING

100%
Gillard E., Schaeken W., Van Dooren W., Verschaffel L.
Studia Psychologica
|
2011
|
vol. 53
|
issue 4
385 – 401
EN
Dual-process theories and the intuitive rules theory are influential in the domain of cognitive psychology and of the psychology of mathematics education respectively. The authors discuss similarities between these frameworks that have developed largely separately. They examine quantitative reasoning with geometrical concepts, a paradigmatic task in the intuitive rules research tradition, from a typical dual-process perspective. First, in two experiments, they validate that intuitive responses result from processes exhibiting two main heuristic processing characteristics as posited in the dual-process framework: fastness and effortlessness. Moreover, they discuss the reaction time (RT) findings with regard to the currently central debate in the dual-process literature about how heuristic and analytic processes interact. A position concerning this topic is currently lacking in the intuitive rules theory. The authors discuss how our RT findings contribute to the theorizing in the current dual-process literature.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.