Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Quad
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article argues that in the 21st century, international order has not only become unstable but also shortterm in nature and issue-based, which has led to the emergence of a number of alliances whose functionality can be questioned. A number of alliances are being formed and are in existence but without any clear goals and objectives. This hypothesis is applied to understand the nature of the recently formed AUKUS-Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States’ alliance in the Indo-Pacific region. The paper, taking the framework of international order, argues that AUKUS would be one such alliance that has started with a lot of promises but its fundamental proposition to counter the rise of China in the Indo-Pacific region-although it does not mention the name of the country-is impractical. Given the economic rise of China as well as the example of the Five Eyes (FVEY) of intelligence sharing mechanism of the Anglophone countries formed during the early years of the Cold War, the AUKUS may survive the test of time but it also may exist as an example of the patterns of the current international order-that is another alliance without a clear path. This article also takes into account of the reaction of the Southeast Asian nations and criticisms against AUKUS in Australia. It points out how Australia’s security should be viewed more comprehensively.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Quad–Australia. Nowe otwarcie

61%
EN
Ten years after the collapse of the first version of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QSD), the new „Quad” is growing, with the participation of the same counties: Australia, India, Japan and the United States. Why after the fall of the idea did they return to this platform again? The answer seems to be obvious, not only for those who wanted to maintain the „Quad” but also for those who did not treat it as a priority. The growing strength and assertiveness of China convinced these four states to launch the new „Quad”. For Australia, the key factor for the effectiveness of the new Quadrilateral Security Dialogue will be to deepen mutual cooperation with special emphasis on India, as well as to convince ASEAN countries to the idea of the Indo-Pacific. Only in this way „Quad” would guarantee security in the region, as much as to create an alternative to the China’s Belt and Road project. It is Australian chance to balance the power, through bringing order to the region, on principles that are favorable for itself.
PL
Dziesięć lat po upadku pierwszej wersji Czterostronnego Dialogu Bezpieczeństwa, rozwija się nowy „Quad” z udziałem tych samych państw: Australii, Japonii, Stanów Zjednoczonych oraz Indii. Dlaczego powrócono do tej idei raz jeszcze? Odpowiedź wydaje się oczywista nie tylko dla tych, którzy chcieli utrzymania dialogu, ale także dla wszystkich, którzy nie traktowali go priorytetowo. Rosnąca siła i asertywność Chin przekonała „czwórkę” do ponownego otwarcia „Quad”. Dla Australii kluczem do skuteczności nowego Czterostronnego Dialogu nBezpieczeństwa będzie pogłębienie wzajemnej współpracy, ze szczególnym naciskiem na Indie oraz przekonanie państw ASEAN do wizji Indo-Pacyfiku. Tylko w ten sposób „Quad” może stać się gwarantem bezpieczeństwa w regionie, jak również tworzyć alternatywę dla chińskiego projektu Pasa i Szlaku. To szansa Australii na korzystne zrównoważenie sił przez doprowadzenie do porządku w regionie, na korzystnych dla siebie warunkach.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.