Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  REPRESENTATION OF THE PAST
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

O DVOCH POHĽADOCH NA HISTORICKÉ NARÁCIE A PLURALITU ICH OBRAZOV MINULOSTI

100%
Šuch J.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2015
|
vol. 70
|
issue 8
659 – 669
EN
The article deals with two approaches to constructing a historical narrative: that of Hayden White, who considers historical narratives to be narrative interpretations. He argues that the plurality of historical narratives arises from the plurality of narrative forms used in the representations of the past. For M. Mandelbaum, N. Carroll and D. Carr on the other side the historical representation of the past is a sort of map or copy of reality. According to the author, both conceptions face the problem of selecting those historical narratives, which would not provoke objections on the side of historians. He argues that constructing a historical narrative associates necessarily with different interpretations of sources as well as different representations of the past.
2

Prolegomena do etnografii „pomników historii i kultury narodowej”. Dziedzictwo jako wymiar nowoczesnej historyczności

88%
Klekot E.
Rocznik Antropologii Historii
|
2011
|
issue 1-2
33-48
EN
Taking as her starting point the concept of “historicity”, understood as a way of conceiving the past through different social practices [Hirsh and Stewart 2005], the author reflects on the results of her long term ethnographic research on two prominent “monuments of Polish history and culture”: namely the royal castles in Warsaw and Cracow. Following up on Hirsh and Stewart’s insight that academic history is one of the modern historicities, the article proposes taking “history” and “heritage” (understood by David Lowenthal [1998] as two co–existing sets of past–oriented practices) for two modes of modern historicity, arguing that to some extent they also correspond to different modes of representation of the past in modernity, as described by Bann [1984]. Pointing to the late modern crisis of representation, the author studies the politics of the representation of the past, focusing on historic monuments. It is suggested that their status is legitimized on two levels of power relations. On the macroscale the stance of subsequent political systems and governments are considered, and the material and institutional solutions that result from them are considered, while on the micro–scale the political involvement of the two historic monuments emerges from expert discourses and practices. It is on the micro–scale level of power relations, that historic value is ascribed to objects, and they become heritagized. Ethnographic research of historic monuments should therefore recognize the modes of historicity involved, and describe their selective character and legitimizing practices, opening up the field to further analysis of the power relationships involved.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.