Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  RESEARCHER
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The analysis covers the dynamics of the number of specialists performing R&D by scientific field and in selected disciplines, against the dynamics of R&D financing in Ukraine over the past 14 years. It's shown that apart from the strong (more than thrice) reduction in the total number, this period marked quite essential change in the structure of the R&D personnel in Ukraine. Social sciences proved to be the most demanded by the State, in view of the essential growth in absolute numbers of their researchers and their structural share. A positive dynamics could be secured by natural sciences, as the share of their researchers grew from 19% to 37%. However, it wouldn't be fair to say now that the Ukrainian science features prevalence of researchers in the engineering profile: while in 1995 they accounted for 72% of the total amount of researchers, in 2009 their share fell to 47%. The situation in humanities, although being quite alarming, seems to be somewhat less dramatic. Regarding the qualification structuring, the share of doctors of science has been up, in parallel with quite rapidly reducing share of candidates of sciences. The conclusion is made about irrelevance of the established qualitative and structural tendency to the innovation objectives, which requires comprehensive analysis and proper response from the State.
EN
Researcher meets different situations depending from specifics of his field of interest during implementation of transparent qualitative research. Various societies or subcultures with their own standards and customs can react differently when facing research interest and perceive as important different aspects of mutual communication, possibly not previously seen by researcher. During process of shaping terrain/researcher relations both involved sides constructing image of the other on basis of their own ideas and interpretations coming from environment, from which they come and are involved by. The article based on author ś own oral history research in community of tramps from Brno deals with possibilities of formation of constructed images about researcher, which could significantly involve content of realized interviews. Principles and recommendations of oral history research along with standards based on qualitative research codes of ethics can produce a lot of inspiration for field research in sensitive environments, but also can create some ethical dilemma depending from efforts to balance between research transparencies and endeavour to create the best atmosphere for realizing research. The efforts to “impress” do not mislead ourselves and also don't lose access to narrators. In the article he is analysing assumptions for creating the situation, which he meets during “defining positions” and “looking for understanding” in his research.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.