Search results

1

Tzv. státní škola v ruské historiografii: zachycení jejích počátků a zformování v dobovém odborném tisku

100%

Šaur J.

Slovanský přehled: historická revue pro dějiny střední, východní a jihovýchodní Evropy (Slavonic Review: Review for Central, Eastern and Southeastern European history)

|

2012

|

vol. 98

|

issue 5

537-573

EN

The paper offers a detailed analysis of the foundation of the “state school” in the sekond half of the 1840s in the works of Kavelin and Solovyov and follows its development up to the 1860s, when the formation of the school rounded off with the works of Chicherin. The established facts are then confronted with rendering of the activities of the school in the contemporary press and historiography, in order to demonstrate which historiographical conceptions were justified. The article presents the conception of the “state school” in the works of M. P. Pogodin, V. G. Belinsky, N. G. Chernyshevsky, I. Y. Zabelina and particularly in the works of N. K. Bestuzhev-Ryumin and P. N. Milyukov.

2

VOJNA A POLITIKA. PRÍPADOVÁ ŠTÚDIA NA PRÍKLADE ČS. LEGIONÁROV V RUSKU. NOVÉ RUSKÉ POHĽADY A HODNOTENIA

100%

Vrábel F.

Studia Politica Slovaca: časopis pre politické vedy, najnovšie politické dejiny a medzinárodné vzťahy

|

2014

|

vol. 7

|

issue 1

66 – 76

EN

The author explores the relationship between politics and war through an analysis of the Czechoslovak Legions and the Civil War in Russia. Developments between the years 1917 and 1920, as well as subsequent events in Russia in the following decades up until today, serve as a classic example of the relationship between war and politics. In the years 1917 – 1922, the Russian nation, together with its neighbours, went through a very difficult period of the Civil War. The events in Russia in 1917 – 1920 partially affected the Czechoslovak Army Corps, which were stalled there after the Bolsheviks had concluded peace with the Central Powers at Brest-Litovsk. Earlier Marxist historiography in the former Soviet Union and in Czechoslovakia viewed these events from a class and partisan perspective, and, under the pressure from communist ideology and censorship, echoed the positions of the Bolshevik leaders, particularly of Vladimir Lenin. After 1990, an opportunity for new approaches and a more objective view on this stage of Russian and Slovak history opened up in Russia as well.

3

THE TERMINOLOGY OF FEUDALISM IN RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY (Terminologia ustroju feudalnego w historiografii rosyjskiej II polowy XIX w.)

100%

Podolan E.

Klio. Czasopismo poświęcone dziejom Polski i powszechnym

|

2009

|

issue 2(13)

115-128

EN

The author states that once upon a time Russian structures of power were similar to those in Western Europe and - consequently - he focuses on their terminology in Russian sources since the fourteenth century. He concentrates on political and legal system as well as political and social changes in Rus and widely presents terms and concepts, which were used in the historical sources to describe these phenomena. He also tries to explain the genealogical terminology of agnatic seniority, which regulated relations between Russian dukes. There was a hierarchy of 'brotherhood' that distinguished between 'older' and 'younger' brothers within the group of dukes, what brought serious political and legal consequences. The Grand Duke of Moscow was an 'older brother', the other dukes were 'younger ones'. Such a form of inter-ducal relations had legal, political and ideological implications. The recognition of one's seniority by a younger duke-brother was an act of his conscious choice (alternatively will) or duress. The second part of the article is a historiographical research into history of Rus. The author examines historical writing of the second half of the nineteenth century. The terminology used in the nineteenth century historical literature shows on the one hand a specific development of Slav lands', and a similarity with Western European countries, on the other hand. I.e. zakladniczetwo was believed to be similar with commendation and pomiesti with benefice. It was Michajlowicz Solowjow (1820-1879) who saw similarities between various institutions, but at the same time emphasized the existence of two types of 'socio-economic systems'. One of them - feudal system, was characteristic of German states, the other one - inter-ducal family relations, typical of Slavic states. The Russian historian, who rejected approaches of both: 'Slavofils' and 'Westernisers', and who advanced the thesis, that socio-economic system of Rus was indeed feudal, was Nikolaj Pawlowicz Pawlow-Silwanski (1869-1908). He showed, that in Rus all elements of feudalism were present, i.e. the problem of partitioning of power connected with the development of jurisdiction granted to feudal lords and bojarszczina. This concept was further developed by Aleksander Jewgieniewicz Priesniakow (1870-1929), the disciple of Sergiej Platonow.

Refine search results

1 Klio. Czasopismo poświęcone dziejom Polski i powszechnym

1 Slovanský přehled: historická revue pro dějiny střední, východní a jihovýchodní Evropy (Slavonic Review: Review for Central, Eastern and Southeastern European history)

1 Studia Politica Slovaca: časopis pre politické vedy, najnovšie politické dejiny a medzinárodné vzťahy

1 Podolan E.

1 Vrábel F.

1 Šaur J.

1 2014

1 2012

1 2009

Tzv. státní škola v ruské historiografii: zachycení jejích počátků a zformování v dobovém odborném tisku

VOJNA A POLITIKA. PRÍPADOVÁ ŠTÚDIA NA PRÍKLADE ČS. LEGIONÁROV V RUSKU. NOVÉ RUSKÉ POHĽADY A HODNOTENIA

THE TERMINOLOGY OF FEUDALISM IN RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY (Terminologia ustroju feudalnego w historiografii rosyjskiej II polowy XIX w.)