Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Radical Orthodoxy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In this paper, we will describe and systematically discuss the heterogeneous and diversified structure of the current theological and philosophical debate concerning Trinitarian ontology, or Trinitarian metaphysics. Our point of departure will be the New Trinitarian Ontologies conference held in Cambridge in September 2019. Recapitulating the most significant contributions presented at this conference, we will identify the key approaches to the problem of a Trinitarian revision of ontology and gradually reconstruct their main arguments. At the end of our paper, we will be concerned with the mutual relations between these approaches. This should serve to clarify to what extent the postmodern fragmentary and pluralistic discourse of the New Trinitarian Ontologies conference actually converges with both the philosophical and theological core of Trinitarian ontology, to the self‑ giving of the Triune God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Open Theology
|
2014
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
EN
This paper uses Douglas Pratt’s typology of religious extremism and fundamentalism to argue that John Milbank’s Radical Orthodoxy employs styles of rhetoric and representation of the religious Other that have clear affinities with such ideologies. While clearly demarcating Milbank’s theology from what is normally termed fundamentalism or extremism, the paper shows that nevertheless similar rhetoric and judgements are employed that suggests that his theology is at best unhelpful, and at worst potentially dangerous. Focusing upon Milbank’s early work, the paper suggests that such rhetoric can be found through much of his writings, but notes that a different approach can be detected in his most recent writings. Suggestions for more productive modes of theological encounters with the religious Other are advanced, which suggest how the ideology of Radical Orthodoxy may be in potential sympathy with such ideas.
Nurt SVD
|
2020
|
issue 2
213-229
PL
Radykalna Ortodoksja (ekumeniczna, ponadwyznaniowa) coraz mocniej zaznacza swą obecność we współczesnej akademickiej teologii zachodniej. Jej trzon tworzą teolodzy anglikańscy. Główny kierunek Radykalnej Ortodoksji stanowi ostra krytyka nowoczesności i jej inherentnych przejawów (sekularyzm, paradygmat oświeceniowy, kulturowy nihilizm, scjentyzm, kapitalizm). Ważna jest również refleksja na temat skutków reformacji i miejsca protestantyzmu we współczesnym chrześcijaństwie. Reformacja jest rozumiana jako jeden z najważniejszych faktów historycznych cywilizacji zachodniej – integralny element zespołu zjawisk, inicjujących nowożytność. Artykuł ma na celu omówienie poglądów szkoły Radykalnej Ortodoksji dotyczących protestantyzmu oraz teologiczno-kulturowych i społecznych konsekwencji reformacji. Teolodzy tego ruchu zakładają, że scholastyka i protestantyzm stanowią teologiczną ciągłość, o czym świadczy wspólny obszar teologicznych dociekań zaobserwowany u liderów teologii scholastycznej, jak i ojców reformacji.
EN
Radical Orthodoxy (ecumenical, supra-denominational) emphasizes its presence in contemporary academic Western theology; its core are Anglican theologians. The main direction of Radical Orthodoxy is a severe criticism of modernity and its inherent manifestations (secularism, the enlightenment paradigm, cultural nihilism, scientism and capitalism). It is also important to reflect on the effects of the Reformation and the place of Protestantism in contemporary Christianity. The Reformation is understood as one of the most important historical facts in Western civilization – an integral element of the set of phenomena initiating modernity. The article aims to discuss the views of the Radical Orthodoxy School regarding Protestantism as well as theological, cultural and social consequences of the Reformation. Theologians of this movement assume that scholasticism and Protestantism constitute a theological continuity, as evidenced by the common area of theological inquiry observed among leaders of scholastic theology and the fathers of the Reformation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.