Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: Reichenbach

Sort By:

Limit search:

All’incrocio tra semantica e pragmatica (parte 1): le espressioni deittiche da Peirce a Reichenbach

100%

Szantyka I. A.

Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature

2009

issue 33

140-156

The objective of this work divided in two parts is to review, in the most objective way and in accordance to the chronological order, different approches to the problematical question of the deicitc expressions, theories sometimes divergent, other times convergent between themselves and in relation to the approach inspired by the results of Bar-Hillel’s, Kaplan’s, Perry’s and Kleiber’s theoretical research, and announced in expressis verbis in the first part of this contribution’s title. The tentative to treat the deictic expressions as units which belong at the same time to the semantics’ and the pragmatics’ domain can be discreetly observed already in the Bühler’s (indexicals as signals and symbols) and Burks’ (deictics as indexical symbols) philosophical and semiotic thought, but also in the reductionist token-reflexivity theory of Reichenbach (division type / token). The results of Peirce’s and Russell’s research are also relevant, because, being diametrically opposed respect to the approaches mentioned above, they inspired, according to the principle of contradiction, the philosophical and linguistic theories, to which methodologies we explicitly refer.

Considerazioni sull’uso aoristico del trapassato prossimo

57%

Scarpel S.

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura

2017

issue 9(1) "Gli orizzonti dell’italianistica: tradizione, attualita e sfide di ricerca"

121-131

Pier Marco Bertinetto teorizza la tendenza del trapassato prossimo a perdere le sue caratteristiche aspettuali ordinarie per acquisire le proprietà propulsive tipiche del passato remoto, tendenza riconducibile a un fenomeno più vasto conosciuto come aoristic drift. Obiettivo di questo articolo è proporre una diversa interpretazione di tale problematica. Si ritiene infatti che sia possibile individuare quel momento di riferimento che caratterizza l’aspettualità del trapassato prossimo anche nei casi in cui esso viene usato per esprimere il proseguimento degli eventi di una narrazione.

Pier Marco Bertinetto formułuje hipotezę o tendencji włoskiego czasu zaprzeszłego trapassato prossimo do utraty swoich definicyjnych właściwości aspektowych i zyskania typowych cech aorystycznego czasu przeszłego passato remoto. Tendencja ta jest związana z szerszym zjawiskiem językowym zwanym aoristic drift. Celem poniższego artykułu jest przedstawienie innej interpretacji tego problemu. Autor uważa, że można zlokalizować punkt odniesienia R, charakteryzujący wartość aspektową czasu trapassato prossimo, nawet w przypadkach, w których czas ten jest wykorzystywany do wyrażania wydarzeń po sobie następujących w tekście narracyjnym.

Refine search results

1 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura

1 Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature

1 Scarpel S.

1 Szantyka I. A.

1 2017

1 2009

Search results

All’incrocio tra semantica e pragmatica (parte 1): le espressioni deittiche da Peirce a Reichenbach

Considerazioni sull’uso aoristico del trapassato prossimo