Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Reviews
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Tomasz Bilczewski, Komparatystyka i interpretacja. Nowoczesne badania porównawcze wobec translatologii. Kraków: Universitas, 2010 Tomasz Bilczewski (redakcja, wstęp, opracowanie), Niewspółmierność. Perspektywy nowoczesnej komparatystyki. Antologia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2010

100%
Szczerba M.
Rocznik Komparatystyczny
|
2012
|
vol. 3
p. 277-286
EN
The text discusses two publications by Tomasz Bilczewski. The first one, Komparatystyka i interpretacja. Nowoczesne badania porównawcze wobec translatologii [Comparative Literature and Interpretation. Modern Comparative Studies in the face of Translation Studies] is an extended version of his doctoral thesis. It presents modern comparative literature in the perspective of its tradition, history and relations with translation studies. Bilczewski regards comparative literature as an activity of the deepest and most existential nature, diligently examining cases of breaching and crossing a variety of cultural differences. The author of Comparative Literature and Interpretation puts his examination against many twentieth century humanistic trends (formalism, structuralism, feminism, postcolonial studies, deconstruction), indicating that it cannot be limited to the narrow number of modern literature trends and methodology. Bilczewski’s examination was extended by literature analytical essays and its translations (the author focuses on relations between Mickiewicz and Keats poetry and correlates various Polish translation of Yeats texts), which shows practical application of his comparative studies. The second discussed publication entitled Niewspółmierność. Perspektywy nowoczesnej komparatystyki [Incommensurate. Perspectives of Modern Comparative Literature] is Bilczewski’s original anthology, which includes texts written during past few decades by comparative literature scholars. The comparative literature presented in the anthology shows its anti-essential and anti-institutional inclinations. In this perspective, only the comparative examination seems to be continuously used as the critical tool deconstructing findings of the modern humanities. Bilczewski’s texts, discussed above, surely should be acknowledged as innovative, as they present various original, not often seen in Poland, interpretations of comparative literature. Comparative Literature and Interpretation seems to be the first, fully analysed essay on comparison and translation studies’ problems published within last few years in Poland. Niewspółmierność [Incommensurate] could be treated as compendium and as a guide, the value of which could not be overrated by any comparative literature expert.
2

Przeciw „literaturze w sosie własnym” .Edward Kasperski, Kategorie komparatystyki. Warszawa: nakładem Wydziału Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2010

100%
Rajewska E.
Rocznik Komparatystyczny
|
2012
|
vol. 3
p. 267-276
EN
Kategorie komparatystyki [Categories of Comparative Literature] by Edward Kasperski presents comparative literature as a discipline going far beyond literary studies, responding to the needs of human consciousness, which develops constantly through comparison not only of objects and phenomena, but also of concepts, cultures and civilizations. According to the author, comparative research in this broad sense “should be the alternative to conceptions of «stewing literature in its own juice», that prevailed in XXth-century scholarship”. Literary studies, once a midwife of comparative literature, are now a subfield of cultural comparative studies, although Kasperski admits that literature has a privileged position in his discussion – it is his comparandum. The author declares himself an adherent of comparative literature “open” to visual images, film, theatre, music and dance as well as philosophy, cultural studies, literary anthropology, theory of discourse, hermeneutics. However, Edward Kasperski, is simultaneously not willing to open comparative literature to a perspective different than Western, unlike Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak who has proposed an inclusive comparative literature.
3
Content available remote

Bibliografie lokalne w opinii krytyków

75%
Znajomski A.
Przegląd Biblioteczny
|
2018
|
vol. 86
|
issue 3
374-391
EN
Thesis/Objective – The aim of this article is to present issues discussed in the reviews of local bibliographies. Research methods – The author used the analysis and critique of reviews of Polish local bibliographies of general nature. Results and conclusions – The reviews discuss a number of important issues such as the selection of the documents, description, arrangement, retrieval and auxiliary tools and typographical order of the bibliographies. The research shows that the prevailing number of the analyzed bibliographies includes various shortcomings as regards method and editing. In order to avoid such mistakes the bibliographies should be evaluated more often by the professionals while being prepared for the publication.
PL
Tezy/cel artykułu – Podstawowym celem artykułu jest prezentacja zagadnień podejmowanych w recenzjach bibliografii lokalnych. Metody badań – Zastosowano metodę krytyki i analizy recenzji poświęconych polskim bibliografiom lokalnym o charakterze ogólnym. Wyniki i wnioski – Recenzje poruszają szereg ważkich problemów związanych z doborem i selekcją materiału, opisem, układem, aparatem informacyjno-pomocniczym oraz ukształtowaniem typograficznym bibliografii. Przeprowadzone badania dowodzą, że przeważająca część ocenianych spisów posiada różnego typu mankamenty natury metodycznej i edytorskiej. W celu ich wyeliminowania należy częściej poddawać je ocenie specjalistów i to już na etapie przygotowania wydawniczego.
4
Content available remote

Recenzje użytkowników księgarni internetowej jako źródło informacji o książce i czytelnictwie. Komunikat z badań

63%
Olczak-Kardas M., Jachimczyk A.
Rocznik Bibliologiczno-Prasoznawczy
|
2012
|
vol. 15
|
issue 4
180-193
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.