Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Russian literature of the 19th century
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The present study explores the ways of utilizing literature in political dispute, as defined by Bakhtin’s concept of speech genres exploited in secondary genres. The material includes Turgenev’s and Dostoyevsky’s novels and Yevgeny Chirikov’s family chronicle. The writers in question present politics in the anthropological sense of the term: as man’s relation to his social reality. The author attempts to determine which literary works were viewed as politically motivated and what functions they fulfilled in political disputes. The analysis reveals the following: literary works often served as a pretext to start a dispute, and in the dispute itself – as a means of defining the protagonists’ cultural and generational identity and values, as a rhetorical trick, as a source of social concepts and behaviours, as a catalyst for a revolutionary paradigm and, finally, as a means of discriminating against political opponents. On these grounds, the author is inclined to argue that Russian literature of the 19th century constituted a strong social communication component and provided ideological material for political discourse.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Два вида топосов

51%
EN
The article deals with the classification of topoi and offers a distinction between conceptualizing topoi, based on similarity and juxtaposition or on the conceptual element of a rhetorical argument, and descriptive topoi, describing the world and the human being, which are close to formulae and cliches. The two kinds of topoi correspond to two fundamental categories of argumentation: “reflection” and “description”. The functions of these topoi are demonstrated on numerous examples from the literature of the post-rhetorical era (19th century), proving the continuity between this literature and the socalled “epoch of the ready-made word”.
RU
В статье ставится вопрос о разновидностях топосов и предлагается классификация, включающая топосы-концептуализаторы, в основе которых лежит уподобление и сопоставление или концептуальный элемент риторического аргумента, и топосы-дескрипторы, описывающие мир и человека и близкие к формулам и клише. Два вида топосов соответствуют фундаментальным категориям аргументации: «рассуждению» и «описанию». Функционирование этих топосов демонстрируется на многочисленных примерах из литературы постриторической эпохи (XIX в.), чем доказывается ее преемственность по отношению к «эпохе готового слова».
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.