Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Rz 1
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Paul, apostle to the nations, is proud of the Good News, which is so significant to the history of mankind. How does the propositio in Rom 1,16-3, 20 concerning God’s righteousness in the Gospels relate to His anger with those who are against the true Law of God? The subpropositio (Rom 1,18-32) shows God as angry due to that, which is evil, as in the Old Testament, where He is radically opposed to all evil, not toward people or individuals. God is the only just judge, since all men have sinned: Paul confronts those Jews who claim to be righteous or simply following the Law given them. He stressed that God’s judgement is not biased in favour of Jews, equal in God’s sight to the pagans who naturally wish to obey the Law (Rom 2,18-20). Next, Paul shows that all people are saved by Jesus Christ, since he came and took away sin, making all righteous in God’s sight (Rom 3,21-22). The message taught by Paul is that the Gospel has saving power for all people who believe, regardless of ethnic background.
The Biblical Annals
|
1977
|
vol. 24
|
issue 1
59-68
PL
On rappèlle dans cet étude certaines polémiques précedant la promulgation du decret du Vatic. I sur la possibilité de la connaissance naturelle de Dieu. La negation de cette possibilité ne peut être justifiée ni par la théologie de saint Paul ni par les opinions des Pères de l’Eglise. La difticulté signalée par certains participants du Concil - ainsi que par quelques éxégetes provient de ce qu’on ne se rend compt, parfois, du caractère spécifique de la notion de la connaissance de Dieu en Rm 1, 18-33.
EN
The article analyzes the motif of divine wrath in Rom 1:18-32. The author starts with a survey of the recent proponents of the “apocalyptic Paul” (Albert Schweitzer, Ernst Käsemann, J. Christiaan Beker, Douglas Campbell, N.T. Wright et al.). Next, the basic elements of the apocalyptic language in Rom 1:18-32 are scrutinized: the idea of revelation (ἀποκαλύπτ-), God’s sovereign rule over the world (παραδίδωμι), and God’s saving wrath (ὀργή). The author then demonstrates the place and the dynamics of Rom 1:18-32 within the context of the Pauline argumentation of Rom 1–4. The paper concludes with a concise presentation of the idea of divine wrath as found in the Old Testament and in Jewish and Greco-Roman literature, which allows us to appreciate the novelty and apocalyptic dimension of God’s wrath in Paul.
PL
Artykuł analizuje motyw gniewu Bożego w Rz 1,18-32. Autor wychodzi od przeglądu publikacji biblistów prezentujących „apokaliptycznego Pawła” (Albert Schweitzer, Ernst Käsemann, J. Christiaan Beker, Douglas Campbell, N.T. Wright). Następnie prześwietlone zostają podstawowe elementy apokaliptycznego języka w Rz 1,18-32: idea objawienia (ἀποκαλύπτ-), władzy Boga nad światem (παραδίδωμι) oraz Jego zbawczego gniewu (ὀργή). Dalej autor ukazuje miejsce i dynamikę tekstu Rz 1,18-32 w kontekście argumentacji Pawła w Rz 1–4. Artykuł kończy zwięzła prezentacja idei gniewu Bożego w Starym Testamencie, literaturze żydowskiej i grecko-rzymskiej, co pozwala na odkrycie nowości oraz apokaliptycznego wymiaru Bożego gniewu u Pawła.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.