Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  SENSORY PERCEPTION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The research aims to show the difference between Husserl's phenomenology and philosophy of Immanuel Kant. The author focuses his attention on three points, which are fundamental for Husserl's phenomenology and philosophy of Immanuel Kant: the problem of a priori, the problem of impression of reason on the sensory perception and the question of the legitimacy of the categorical imperative. The question of how independent of the conceptual and methodical presuppositions of Kant's philosophy Husserl is in his attempts to execute the phenomenological revolution in philosophy - or, on the contrary, how dependent he is on these presuppositions is in the spotlight.
EN
The construction of Hobbesian anthropology is sketched with emphasis on these points of his philosophy which seem inconclusive. We focus on: determinism, the notion of conatus/endeavour (which in turn splits into a purely mechanic kind, and a biological one), and on the duality of an-thropological description in Hobbes. In fact, the philosopher attempted to portray human beings both from inside and from outside. The 'inside' view equals to a physics of passions which are in turn rooted in biological conatus (De Corpore, Ch. IV.25.), the 'outside' view is the grim landscape of the state of nature and then the famous 'deduction' of the need of absolute power (Leviathan, Ch. XII). In fact there is no other man than the natural born egoist, as the Hobbesian citizen is simply a tamed beast.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.