Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

NOT ONLY ABOUT 'FEAR'. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE COMMON UNDERSTANDING OF HISTORY (Nie tylko o 'Strachu'. Psychologia potocznego rozumienia historii)

100%
Bilewicz M.
Zaglada Zydów. Studia i Materialy (Holocaust. Studies and Materials)
|
2008
|
vol. 4
517-526
EN
Publications on the Holocaust and the history of Polish-Jewish relations quite frequently lead to historical debates in the Polish media. On the one hand, it is a unique opportunity to publicise unknown pages of history, and on the other, a potential threat to contemporary Piolish-Jewish relations.This article is an attempt to explain the Polish reactions to Jan Tomasz Gross 'Fear' and the character of similar debates in Polish media. Thanks to the achievements of experimental social psychology (attribution errors, social identity theory, and the sleeper effect), we can now understand why certain books spawn a media debate while others do not; why the contents of the contested books reach the consciousness of a broader audience and why the debates that surround such books less and less resemble true discussion, in which people cease to talk to one another and engage in polemics against the position of their opponents.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Stereotypy i uprzedzenia w środowisku wojskowo-cywilnym Marynarki Wojennej RP

75%
Białopiotrowicz-Buczko E., Baryła W.
Colloquium Wydziału Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych AMW
|
2013
|
issue 2
83-108
EN
Based on the Tajfel’s and Turner’s Social Identity Theory an own research was constructed. The aim of the study was to check whether stereotyping and prejudices occur in relations between groups of army civilians and soldiers working together in the Polish Navy. In a questionnaire, 96 soldiers and 104 army civilians reported perceptions of their own vocational group and of the out-group and expressed dehumanization of the in- and out-group members. Respondents showed in-group favoritism in trait and emotion evaluations, but mutual dehumanization did not occur. However, it is interesting to note that, the group of regular soldiers was dehumanizing itself. The most important finding for practice is that members of both groups who have participated in integration workshops showed lower in-group favoritism, than integration non-participants. The implications of these results are discussed.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.