Search results

1

O PRÁVNOM SYSTÉME

100%

Bárány E.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

|

2015

|

vol. 98

|

issue 4

321 – 337

EN

It is usual to write about law as a system. The systemacity of the law means only a modicum of orderliness and a network of legal norms as basic elements of legal system. There is always a degree of contradiction and/or a tension between legal norms, legal principles and other elements of the legal system. This tension and/or contradiction are characteristic and system creating relationship between elements of Manual system. Legal system is not an axiomatic one for many reasons. It is full of unavailable tensions and contradictions. It is a social normative system determined by society. The elementary unit connecting legal system and social system is legal regulation of great amount of social acts and consequently of social relations, which acquire quality of legal relations. It is also an information (sub) system. Law always strives for an order, but only with a moderate success. It is an open cognitively and operationally open system.

2

Wizje porządku społecznego i ich determinanty. Analiza opinii społeczności warszawskiej

100%

Zaborowski W.

Studia Socjologiczne

|

2011

|

issue 1(200)

407-434

EN

The article presents the analysis of research on the visions of the existing social order that were forming among the citizens of Warsaw in the period preceding the outburst of open social conflict in the 1980s. The author distinguishes five types of these visions: 'optimistic', 'permissive', 'indifferent', 'reformist' and 'radical'. The differentiation of these visions depending on different position in social structure of the individuals who voice them (such as their professional occupation, level of education, place of work, economic standing, social background, belonging to social organizations, membership in political organizations and attitudes to religion) forms the central analytical problem of the article. The analysis aims at finding out, which features of social position favor particular types of visions of existing social order. The patterns of dependencies derived from multivariate analysis are far from being clear-cut, however, which leads the author to suggesting that position in social structure cannot be sole predictor of attitudes to existing social order and perhaps other factors (i.e. cultural ones) have to be included in the analysis.

3

Forum: Questions about social order

100%

Aniol W., Nieciunski W., Baszkiewicz J., Dziewiecka-Bokun L., Ejsmond Z., Frieske K. W., Gilejko L., Horodenski R., Kabaj M., Kowalik T., Kozlowski, P., Markiewicz W., Modzelewski W., Morawski W., Morecka Z., Rakowski M., Sadowski A., Sadowski Z., Stasiak A., Tabin M., Wilkin J.

Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje

|

2004

|

issue 6

13-124

EN

The special feature of this issue is debate concerning explanations of the new social order in Poland and remedies to its internal problems after 1989. Professor W. Nieciunski wrote an essay based on five important and basic questions about social order and modernization of Poland. What were the sources of 1989 revolution and decay of the state socialism in the Soviet Union? What changes occurred during restitution of capitalism (systemic transformation) and what consequences did they have? What antagonisms and conflicts shape Poland's external environment? What kind of goals and activities for modernization should we promote to remove Poland's civilizational delay? What systemic arrangements can ensure conciliatory resolution of unavoidable internal conflicts as well as creation of conditions favorable to general progress of Polish society and realization of goals necessary for modernization? Twenty prominent figures from Polish academic community agreed to answer and to discuss points made by professor W. Nieciunski.

4

ON THE (NON-)CONTRACTUAL NATURE OF RULES: CONTRASTING DURKHEIM AND BUCHANAN

88%

Valentinov V.

Sociológia (Sociology)

|

2007

|

vol. 39

|

issue 6

522-534

EN

The paper examines the viewpoints of James Buchanan and Emile Durkheim on the question whether the maintenance of social order can be understood as resulting from contractual exchange of rational individuals. It is argued that neither Buchanan's normative individualism requires considering the maintenance of social order as an outcome of an exchange process, nor Durkheim's notion of moral integration requires embracing methodological holism. On this basis, the paper proposes an individualist understanding of social order as collective self-sufficiency rather than exchange. The broader implication of this argument is that institutions must be generally viewed as based on variable combinations of self-sufficiency and exchange as alternative mechanisms of gratifying human wants.

5

THE INTELLECTUAL IN REVOLUTION (Intelektualista (w) rewolucji)

75%

Cwikla P.

Studia Socjologiczne

|

2009

|

issue 2(193)

55-76

EN

The author tries to examine the social role of an intellectual in days of revolution. The author focuses on the meaning of an idea - an abstraction, which begins to have an impact on reality, transforming itself into ideology and creating ideologists. The problem is illustrated by biography of Camille Desmoulins, one of the main figures of French Revolution. The author also pays attention to possibility of using elements of sociological theory in order to interpret the revolutionary intellectual's motivations and aims. Florian Znaniecki's categories as put forth in 'Spoleczne role uczonych' as well as Alexis de Tocqueville's reflections regarding relationships between politics and ideologically engaged literature and journalism are also employed.

6

Procesy sakralizacji i desakralizacji życia społecznego na przełomie XX i XXI wieku jako czynniki budowy ładu społecznego

75%

Łapa A.

Colloquium Wydziału Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych AMW

|

2013

|

issue 1

131-144

EN

This article presents the problems associated with the processes of sacralization and desacralization of modern societies which are taking place at the turn of the twentieth and twenty-first century. The clergy protest against desacralization and the society criticizes fundamental tendencies of the clergy. The existing situation is caused by the lack of communication and the dialogue between the modern society and the clergy.

Refine search results

O PRÁVNOM SYSTÉME

Wizje porządku społecznego i ich determinanty. Analiza opinii społeczności warszawskiej

Forum: Questions about social order

ON THE (NON-)CONTRACTUAL NATURE OF RULES: CONTRASTING DURKHEIM AND BUCHANAN

THE INTELLECTUAL IN REVOLUTION (Intelektualista (w) rewolucji)

Procesy sakralizacji i desakralizacji życia społecznego na przełomie XX i XXI wieku jako czynniki budowy ładu społecznego