Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  SOCIAL RIGHTS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

K OTÁZKE VPLYVU SOCIÁLNYCH PRÁV NA KVALITU ŽIVOTA

100%
Smolková E.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2023
|
vol. 78
|
issue 5
380 – 394
EN
Questions of happiness or well-being are traditional philosophical themes. These are nowadays covered by the issue of quality of life. Although this is a term whose interpretations vary, the terms well-being, happy or fulfilling life are used. The issue is interdisciplinary and resonates across disciplines, including philosophy. Quality of life is a topic that is approached from different perspectives and from different points of view. In this study, we will focus on the philosophical aspects of quality of life issues that are related to human rights, especially social rights, and examine those aspects that are central to quality of life issues, particularly in the context of the operation of ethical normative criteria related to social rights and their bearing on quality-of-life concerns. The aim of the study is thus to look for the intersection between the individual and the social to highlight that it is social rights that have had and continue to have the most significant impact on quality of life. They are a tool to ensure the basic necessities of life but also the ideas of equality and justice. They are an essential prerequisite for personal development since they create objective possibilities for seizing opportunities and those qualitative indicators that make it possible, in the long term, to live a fulfilling life.
2

ZÁRUKY ZAISTENIA SOCIÁLNEJ ÚROVNE JEDNOTLIVCA

100%
Lacko M.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2014
|
vol. 97
|
issue 5
487 – 506
EN
In identifying legal guarantees aimed at ensuring the social level of the individual, which is significantly created by the constitutional social rights expressed by statutory legislation, we face problems of interpretation of the definition of basic human right and freedom. The Constitution of the Slovak Republic associates this concept in practice only with the fundamental rights and freedoms of the “first generation”. As well as relative and accessorial nature of constitutional social rights are based mainly on the formulation of the Art. 51 Paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic, they don´t guarantee a sufficient level of social assurance of an individual. The above mentioned is a serious deficiency in relation with the purpose of social rights, which is to ensure a reasonable degree of individual freedom through equality in material guarantees. Despite the lower legal availability of the essence of social rights within all the application or enforceability of (constitutional) social rights of an individual, it cannot be considered as a refusal of rights pertaining to an individual (citizen). The state is obliged to ensure and provide guarantees ensuring social level of the individual and it is through respecting the principles of the Rechtsstaat in its established and regulated legal environment. Full respect of the constitutional principles of Rechtsstaat eliminates illegitimate interventions in social-legal status of an individual, which, by their intensity, would fundamentally change the quality level of the individual’s status. Analysis of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic is apparent insufficient to ensure a balance between the principle of equality and the principle of certainty. Finally, the state is obliged to comply with the non-excludable (special) economic dimension of the real individuals’ access to their constitutional social rights via state resources, which in accordance with Art. 55 Paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic are created within a market economy based inter alia on the social principles.
3

„SOCIÁLNY KAPITÁL“: KRITICKÁ PERSPEKTÍVA A NACHÁDZANIE OPTIMÁLNEJ SIGNIFIKANCIE

88%
Ruman J.
Studia Politica Slovaca: časopis pre politické vedy, najnovšie politické dejiny a medzinárodné vzťahy
|
2013
|
vol. 6
|
issue 1
24 – 40
EN
“Social capital” has nowadays become a fashionable term, as well as a tool of the theoreticians trying to describe certain consequences of social changes within civil societies and then to apply it as an indicator of stability, social cohesion, integrity, solidarity and cooperation. The author of this study deals with the genesis of the concept, starting with the specific historical moment of its first application up to the contemporary Czech and Slovak enriching way of viewing the subject. In connection with the genesis of the concept the author outlines three main representatives - Bourdieu, Coleman and Putnam - who by means of their researches contribute to its formation most markedly. He also tries to map the general characteristics of this concept - to aptly express its definition, nature, role and function. The author as well pays attention to the causal connections of the concept formation and to its subsequent application, stressing the questions of relevance and significance of the whole concept. In conclusion, the author focuses on the critical-reflexive view of the subject matter and on the finding of adequate approaches that would enable an optimal accumulation and cultivation of “social capital”. The author, inspired by an approach developed by Czech historian D. Třeštík and by his terminological enrichment of the topic, comes to the conclusion that the term and concept themselves do have their justification and are relevant objects of analysis.
4

K FILOZOFICKÝM OTÁZKAM PRESADZOVANIA SOCIÁLNYCH PRÁV

88%
Smolková E.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2020
|
vol. 75
|
issue 7
555 – 568
EN
The issue of human rights and especially social rights is one of the most complex, intricate, and, at the same time, one of the most common topics of contemporary philosophy. It brings forward traditional philosophical themes of justice and equality, questions of bridging the moral and legal aspects of providing equal opportunities for everyone. The diversity of philosophical underpinnings of social rights allows theorists to grasp the issue from different perspectives and to introduce readers to the possibilities of accepting social rights such as the recognition of human dignity, equal opportunities, and equal chances in life. Social rights provide a way of restoring justice and opportunities for those who would not otherwise have it at all. In principle, however, it does not decide how social rights are designed, but how they are implemented and whether they are enforceable, ie how the system of social services is set up in a state and what approaches states choose in implementing social rights and whether these adequately provide social guarantees for human existence, dignity, life, equal opportunities and prevention of social exclusion.
5

OCHRANA SOCIÁLNYCH PRÁV V KONANÍ PRED ÚSTAVNÝM SÚDOM SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY

75%
Gajdošíková Ľ.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2017
|
vol. 100
|
issue 3
218 – 225
EN
The protection of social rights is offered by general courts and by the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court offers this protection through the proceedings on compliance of the legal regulations, and in individual cases in proceedings on constitutional complaints. The constitutional limits of the protection of social rights are on one side given by the generally binding constitutional principles of the functioning of the state defined in the Constitution, by which the Slovak Republic is bound, on the other side they are also considered as the limits of the scope of social rights contained in legal regulations that govern social rights.
6
Content available remote

TO SLADKÉ SLOVO DEMOKRACIA ... SPOKOJNOSŤ S DEMOKRACIOU A POLITICKÉ ODCUDZENIE NA SLOVENSKU

75%
Gyárfášová O.
Sociológia (Sociology)
|
2015
|
vol. 47
|
issue 4
365 – 389
EN
Based on empirical findings of the ISSP survey the study analyses public perception of rights in democracy, satisfaction with how the democracy works, and external and internal efficacy. Some results are compared in time. The paper conceptualizes the satisfaction with democracy as satisfaction with good governance; furthermore it explores what are the main factors which influence satisfaction with democracy. The author concludes that Slovak citizens give preference to the social rights whereas the political ones (including participation) are perceived as less important. The external efficacy (responsiveness of political elites, level of corruption, fairness, impartiality etc.) has stronger explanatory power than internal efficacy in regard to democracy satisfaction. On the other hand the internal efficacy (interest in politics, cognitive understanding, participation potential etc.) has declined during last nine years.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.