Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  SPECIALIZATION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

THE CURRENT POSITION OF PHILOSOPHY

100%
Doomen J.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2010
|
vol. 65
|
issue 7
672-682
EN
What does the fact that academic philosophy has specialized to a high degree entail its pursuit for? In particular, how can philosophy at present contribute to discussions pertaining to scientific issues? Due to its evolved character, it does not, in contrast to earlier times, when it was still intertwined with the sciences, produce substantial material results. Now the sciences have established themselves as independent domains, its role is limited, being focused on reflection. This does not, however, lead to its demise; in fact, it may, in order to preserve at least the appearance of stability, turn out to be the covering discipline in an ever changing scientific landscape.
2

Technological development, technological complementarity and structural change

100%
Szalavetz A.
Kozgazdasagi Szemle (Economic Review)
|
2004
|
vol. 51
|
issue 4
362-378
EN
The paper looks at the relation between technological development and structural change. It tries to say whether technological development leads automatically to an increased level of specialization. The reverse side of the coin is also examined: whether industries in which a country specializes show a higher than average rate of technological development. Finally an opinion is formed on the old question of whether such things as 'good' specializations exist. In the second part, two well-known theories of structural change - multi-stage theory of technological accumulation, and evolutionary theory, explaining economic growth in terms of emergence and development of new industries - are complemented by the theory of technological complementarity.
3

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TERRITORIES (Sotsialno-ekonomichni aspekty rozvytku silskykh terytorii)

88%
Vaskivska K. V., Sembai I. V.
Rehionalna ekonomika
|
2009
|
issue 2(52)
142-148
EN
On the basis of research results the rating of administrative districts have been determined and districts with high, middle and low effectiveness, according to socio-economic development, have been singled out. Strategy of development of rural areas has been scientifically grounded. For the valuable development of rural areas it is necessary to develop its internal potential, support the revival of small and middle business in the village, create new workplaces as well as to renew the social infrastructure.
4
Content available remote

THE HOSPICE MOVEMENT: THE EXAMPLE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROCESSES OF PERSONALIZED AND RATIONALIZED INSTITUTIONALIZATION

88%
Kubiak A. E., Surikova M.
Sociológia (Sociology)
|
2010
|
vol. 42
|
issue 3
237-254
EN
The article presents the problems of hospice movement in the context of the individualistic social organization, which becomes the predominant pattern of social life in the modern societies. The hospice vision focuses on the interest in the individual and his or her quality of life in the end-of-life phase, which fits the principles of individualism. The analysis of the process of institutionalization of hospice movement shows the conflict between the idealistic aim and the consequences of rationalized medical praxis. The situation of the individual as a matter of public interests is followed by temporal relationships of the hospice workers and the patient and his or her family, breaking the continuity of the natural social bonds, de-privatization the dying, fragmentation of one's life's course and isolation of terminally ill people. These contradictions seem to be the integral part of the individualistic social organization, and as such irresolvable.
5

ROMANIA’S ATTITUDE CONCERNING CMEA SPECIALIZATION (1960-1962). NEW ASSESSMENTS

75%
Stanciu C.
|
2015
|
vol. 63
|
issue 4
629 - 647
EN
Is it worth exporting corn and fodder in exchange for toys and cosmetics? It was a question Gheorghiu-Dej of Romania asked himself, when confronted with increasing East German demands for agricultural exports. He was keen on overcoming underdevelopment through a vast program of industrialization in order to overcome the status of a predominantly agricultural country but he perceived his CMEA partners to be opposing this prospect. In the context of increasing economic difficulties in the Soviet bloc in the early 1960s, an idea was circulated that specialization would help increase efficiency so that Socialist countries could successfully compete on Western markets. But the meaning of specialization appeared different for each country: Gheorghiu-Dej thought that Romania deserved an equal status with other more developed nations of the Soviet bloc, but it soon became clear to him that they had different views. His perception was that the East Germans and Czechoslovaks wanted Romania to remain a provider of agricultural products and hold off its industrialization plans, but he could not accept that. This study argues that intra-CMEA competition between developed and less developed member countries played a major role in compromising the reforms planed by Moscow in the early 1960s.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.