Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  STANDARD SLOVAK LANGUAGE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author goes back to the substance of the Stur's codification from the year 1846 and on the background of general historical and mainly linguistic works about the Stur's movement looks for connections between interlinguistic and extralinguistic reasons of miscarriage of the original codification. He deals with Stur's change of conservatism in the range of the standard language, mainly of this form and structure, and with reasons, which led to the change of the original codification.
EN
The article is a continuation of an ongoing polemics with J. Kacala regarding the recent (1991) codification of the 'rhythmic law'. The author argues that this codification has been based on incorrect theoretical presuppositions, in particular on a concept called 'flectional-derivational zone', which considers the properties of the derivational morphemes as identical with the flectional ones. This assumption led to the codification of non-existent forms and resulted in a destabilization of the norm of the standard Slovak.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2022
|
vol. 57
|
issue 3
229-236
EN
According to the author´s knowledge, Ľudovít Štúr had been preparing for his codification step comprehensively and for a long time. Štúr had explained his reasons for establishing the standard Slovak language on the basis of the dialect spoken in central Slovakia in his work Nárečja slovenskuo alebo potreba písaňja v tomto nárečí (1846). By the establishment of the nationwide standard language he had pursued also a significant social goal – to overcome the then linguistic division of the Slovak nation conditioned by the different religious affiliation of the adherents of then used literary languages; achieving this goal had been considered by him in the above mentioned work necessary. In Štúr´s codification also his deep humanistic conviction has been manifested in which he had surpassed his political competitors as well as foreign political and spiritual leaders. With his efforts Ľudovít Štúr had stood not only at the beginning of ecumenical cooperation of the Slovaks but he had significantly shaped it as well and so he had clearly influenced the activities of the Slovak nation-wide cultural association Tatrín and also Matica slovenská as its immediate successor.
EN
The paper presents theoretical and methodological solutions and a concrete analysis of elaboration of entries in an unfinished Slovnik spisovneho jazyka slovenskeho (Dictionary of Standard Slovak Language) - his incomplete first volume contains entries a - juzny - that had been prepared by Anton Janosik and Eugen Jona. 63 parts of this dictionary were published in 1946 - 1949 by Matica slovenska. A conclusion that comes out from the analysis of the theory and practice of the dictionary, proves that Eugen Jona by his creative participation on the work has significantly contributed to the development of the Slovak lexicology and lexicography.
EN
The paper deals with the development of linguistic knowledge within the history of literary (standard) Slovak on the basis of texts published in the Slovenská reč journal. It reflects on selected theoretical and methodological aspects and themes that were the subject of investigation in connection with the cultivation of Slovak: (a) in the pre-standard period (analysis of previous linguistic works and linguistic artefacts from various communication spheres, analysis of the language of individual authors and scholars, the relationship of Slovak to other languages, especially to Czech); (b) in the standard period (the analysis of codification and other linguistic works, personalities whose codification and editorial activities influenced the establishment and development of standard Slovak as well as its functioning in practice).
EN
The author compares the 1st edition of Samo Cambel ś Rukoväť spisovnej reči slovenskej (1902) and Martin Hattala ś Krátka mluvnica slovenská (1852). She refers to Cambel ś approach to the codification of problematic linguistic items, which varied in use. She has focused on codification changes related to the archaic forms as the most marked group which is the cause of destabilization of the standard norm at the end of the 19th century. She refers to stabilisation character of Cambel ś codification that had removed a tension between previous codification of Slovak and its natural development and with respect to earlier codification works and development tendencies taking into account an assumed following development of the language it became a base of definitive form of contemporary standard Slovak.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.