Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Schumpeter
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
W artykule zaprezentowano rezultaty badania, którego celem było określenie roli kreatywnej destrukcji w kształtowaniu wahań koniunkturalnych w państwach UE w okresie 1 kw. 2000 r. – 1 kw. 2014 r. Badanie wykazało, że procesy kreatywnej destrukcji istotnie determinowały wartość wskaźnika cyklu koniunkturalnego, przy czym oddziaływanie kreacji nie było charakterystyczne jedynie dla okresów poprawy koniunktury, a wpływ destrukcji nie był domeną wyłącznie okresów jej pogorszenia. Każdy z komponentów kreatywnej destrukcji, w zależności od fazy cyklu, pełnił rolę stabilizatora lub destabilizatora gospodarki, co można uznać za przejaw podkreślanego przez Schumpetera dualizmu skutków innowacji.
EN
The article presents the results of the study, the aim of which was to determine the role of creative destruction in the shaping of economic fluctuations in the EU during the period of 1st quarter 2000 – 1st quarter 2014. Our analysis revealed that the processes of creative destruction significantly determined the value of the business cycle indicator. The impact of creation was not characteristic only for the periods of economic recovery and the influence of destruction was not exclusive to periods of stagnation. Each of the components of creative destruction, depending on the phase of the cycle, acted as a stabilizer or a destabilizer of an economy. This can be considered as a manifestation of the dual effects of innovations emphasized by Schumpeter.
2
94%
Zarządzanie i Finanse
|
2013
|
vol. 4
|
issue 4
303-312
PL
Nie ulega wątpliwości, iż własność intelektualna powinna podlegać ochronie, ponieważ jest szczególnie narażona na „kradzież”. Jednak w świetle prawa od jakiegoś czasu dokonuje się proceder wykorzystywania „ochrony” prawnej tylko i wyłącznie w celu odniesienia korzyści przez „niepraktykujące podmioty” (tzw. NPE, czyli non-practicing entities) zwane również trollami patentowymi. Ochrona patentowa jest ściśle powiązana z procesem wdrażania innowacji w gospodarce który opisany został w ramach teorii innowacji J.A. Schumpetera. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie zjawiska nadużywania ochrony praw intelektualnych przez firmy będące „niepraktykującymi podmiotami” (trollami patentowymi) w świetle teorii innowacji J.A. Schumpetera.
Oeconomia Copernicana
|
2016
|
vol. 7
|
issue 1
23-33
EN
Economic development and transformation processes have become much more intense in economic reality in the last years than they have ever been before. At this time a lot of questions were raised about the causes of the actual Global Crisis, future crises, the factors affecting the modern economy, about the essence of contemporary capitalism, demographic problems and overgrown bureaucracy. The most spectacular threat to capitalism, (based on private entrepreneurship) according to Schumpeter, stems from the high, growing and progressive taxation. Schumpeter saw clearly that the financing of public goods and services (requiring taxes, maybe even relatively high) is something other than a clerical control of the economic system that violates the natural economic mechanism. Moreover, Schumpeter says explicitly that an entrepreneur does not have to be one person, he even states that the country (state) itself, or its agenda, can act as an entrepreneur. Therefore, it can be concluded that we may have to deal with “Tax State”, which is typical for “fettered capitalism”, and with “entrepreneurial state”, which is typical for “unfettered capitalism”. The main goal of this paper is to present two different approaches to the economic development concept: Schumpeter’s “fettered” and “unfettered” capitalism in the context of “Tax State” and interventionism. The Author analyzes presented concept in contemporary issues from the banking perspective. In the paper, the Author used critical analysis as a research method. This allowed to identify gaps in the current state of knowledge and the scientific discussion focused on J.A. Schumpeter’s theoretical concept. Analysis was performed in 2015.
EN
This paper explores similarities and differences between the biotechnology sectors of Lithuania and India. In both cases, the biotechnology sectors are major motors of economic growth. In the case of Lithuania, we borrow from Schumpeter’s ideas of innovation and Porter’s business cluster theory, and argue that Lithuania is “at the right place and the right time” to make it a regional leader in Baltic biotechnology. Although very different, India’s biotechnology sector is also rapidly changing and innovating.
5
71%
EN
The goal of this paper is to compare the development of the Lithuanian and Russian biotechnology sectors. In case of Lithuania we tried to uncover what are the circumstances surrounding the favorable development of the biotechnology sectors in Lithuania. In case of Russian Federation we looked at encouraging as well as discouraging circumstances surrounding this segment of economy. Drawing upon Schumpeter’s ideas of innovation and Porter’s business cluster theory, we argue that Lithuania is “at the right place and the right time” to make it a regional leader in Baltic biotechnology. Russia, on the other hand, is in the process of developing biotech sector in order to at least to catch up with other countries (including Lithuania). It will take time and continuous governmental support for Russia before this sector starts contributing significantly to Russian economy.
RU
В статье анализируются последствия неравномерного развития и экономического роста различных стран, причиной чего является различия в инновационной активности экономических агентов, а последствием – усиливающееся неравенство; авторы рассматривают данный феномен как результат действия принципа «созидательного разрушения», описанного Й. Шумпетером.
EN
The article contains an analysis of the consequences of unequitable development and economic growth in different countries; the authors assumes that the reason of this phenomenon is the difference in innovation activity of the economic agents which results in unequal growth; according to authors this is the result of ‘creative destruction’ principle of Joseph Schumpeter.
PL
Artykuł poświęcony jest analizie skutków niezbalansowanego rozwoju oraz wzrostu gospodarczego poszczególnych krajów, czego przyczynę należy upatrywać w różnicy stopnia aktywności innowacyjnej podmiotów gospodarczych, a skutkiem czego jest wzrost nierówności; autorzy dostrzegają w danym zjawisku przejaw działania zasady „destrukcji twórczej” J. Schumpetera.
EN
John Friedmann has taught at MIT, the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, UCLA, the University of Melbourne, the National University of Taiwan, and is currently an Honorary Professor in the School of Community and Regional Planning at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. Throughout his life, he has been an advisor to governments in Brazil, Venezuela, Chile, Mozambique, and China where he was appointed Honorary Foreign Advisor to the China Academy of Planning and Urban Design.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.