Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Standard Czech
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Konkurence variant oni sázejí a oni sází : historie a současnost

100%
Sojka P.
Slovo a slovesnost: časopis pro otázky teorie a kultury jazyka (Slovo a slovesnost: A journal for the theory of language and language cultivation)
|
2018
|
vol. 79
|
issue 2
122-140
EN
The aim of this paper is to describe and analyse the long-term process of paradigm levelling within the IV-verb-class of Czech verbs. This process has been in progress since as early as the 17th century. While in its first stage, the ending '-ejí' spread to the verbs of the 'prosí' and 'trpí' conjugation types, at the end of the 19th century the development began to move in the opposite direction. In 1993, the process finally resulted in the 'oni sází' form being codified alongside the 'oni sázejí' form. However, three inquiries into this variation in the sphere of public communication show that the '-í' form occurs in spoken texts rather than in written ones and that its incidence varies from verb to verb. The more frequent incidence of the '-í' form was only detected in a small group of verbs.
2
Content available remote

Instrumentál plurálu - "pádový kámen úrazu“?

100%
Sojka P.
Naše řeč (Our Speech)
|
2020
|
vol. 103
|
issue 1-2
131-143
EN
In 1981, four Czech language scholars published a significant paper entitled “The current state and future prospects of Standard Czech codification” in the journal Slovo a slovesnost. The paper contained, among others, a list of non-standard morphological variants that – according to the authors – could or should be included in the Standard Czech codification. In the meantime, some of these proposals have actually been realized. However, according to the authors’ statement, the non-standard -ma variant in the plural of the instrumental case still retained a certain degree of stylistic markedness, even though it was no longer distinctively non-standard. Today, forty years later, we aim to answer the question of to what extent we can still agree with this statement, particularly in spoken journalism.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.