Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Supreme Audit Institutions
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2014
|
vol. 59
|
issue 1(354)
149-153
EN
The conference was organised in November 2013 by the Network of the Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) of the EU Candidate and Potential Candidate Countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey) and the European Court of Auditors, with significant support from SIGMA. The objective of the conference was to exchange information and to establish closer relations between SAIs and parliaments: this goal was achieved by the participation of high rank representatives of these bodies, important presentations, lively discussions and informal contacts. Despite differences between individual countries, representatives of SAIs and parliaments unanimously agreed that their institutions need to cooperate, as it is a prerequisite for accountability of the public administration.
EN
The operations of contemporary states and societies are more and more related to information flow. New technologies allow for producing infor mation easily, and for circulating it rapidly. What conclusions should Su preme Audit Institutions draw from this? What should they do in order to deal with important and topical issues of high interest to the public?
EN
Supreme Audit Institutions must face increasing pressure owing to the financial and economic crisis and public finance crisis: contribute to a healthier and more effective functioning of the public accountability system and to generate higher social impacts by their activities. In order to meet these expectations, their value creation processes should be reconsidered and adjusted to the new recognitions about the complex adaptive systems. In his article, the author elaborates on some proposals which are based on the complex systems theory.
EN
As a result of their audits, Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) formulate proposals addressed to auditees and other relevant entities. These may include proposals suggesting a need to change the binding legal acts or to issue new acts (de lege ferenda proposals). In his article, the author describes how NIK develops such proposals in comparison with practices of other SAIs, as well as the activities aimed at providing the quality and effectiveness of such proposals, for instance, by their appropriate formulation, by making a register of proposals, by including the list of proposals in the annual activity report of NIK, and by analysing how de lege ferenda proposals have been used while meeting with representatives of the parliament and the government. The article concludes with the issue of the role of NIK in the law-making process.
EN
In his article, the author presents several elements of the practices of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs): a multiannual audit strategy, selection of non-routine audit topics, informing the public about planned audits or audits in progress, or giving citizens an opportunity to contribute to audits. These illustrate new trends in the works of some SAIs. The inspiration for the article came from the audit conducted by the European Court of Auditors on the performance of public consultations by the European Commission.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2022
|
vol. 67
|
issue 2 (403)
164-172
EN
The main objective of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) is to contribute to efficient operations of the state, and to support citizens in its evaluation. In practice, the efficiency and usefulness of SAIs depend, in the first place, on the extent to which audit recommendations are implemented. SAIs other than courts of audit cannot oblige their auditees to do so, so they use impactful factors, such as, among other, proper selection of audit topics, deep knowledge and experience of auditors, and good communication with other state bodies, citizens and the media. Over the last years, the Austrian Court of Audit has developed a system for publicly inform about the extent of its recommendations implementation. In his article, the author discusses its functioning, and indicates how it impacts the stage of recommendations implementation.
PL
Głównym celem najwyższych organów kontroli (NOK) jest przyczynianie się do sprawnego funkcjonowania państwa i ułatwianie obywatelom jego oceny. W praktyce efektywność i użyteczność NOK zależą przede wszystkim od stopnia realizacji zaleceń wynikających z kontroli. Poza trybunałami obrachunkowymi, NOK nie mogą do tego zobowiązać kontrolowanych, wykorzystują zatem czynniki, na które mają wpływ, takie jak m.in. trafny wybór tematów kontroli, rozległa wiedza i doświadczenie kontrolerów czy dobra komunikacja z innymi organami państwa, obywatelami i środkami masowego przekazu. Izba Obrachunkowa Austrii w ostatnich latach rozwinęła system publicznego informowania o stanie realizacji swoich zaleceń. Artykuł przybliża jego funkcjonowanie i wskazuje, jak wpływa na stopień ich wdrażania.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.