It's been taken granted the conjunctive adverbs do the same function not only in the conjoining of microstructures but also in the conjoining of macrostructures in Korean text building. This paper questions whether macrostructures have conjoining markers such as conjunctive adverbs as in microstructures. For this research, we will examine the editorial articles of the daily newspapers qualitatively because editorials can be supposed to be the most typical written texts. According to the observation of the data and contrary to our expectation, conjunctive adverbs are not prominent at the borders of macrostructures. Instead, other morphological or lexical forms such as zosa or other time/place adverbs are relevant there. Furthermore, the internal cohesion of a macrostructure plays a decisive role in differentiating it from others. Consequently, the conjoining of macrostructures is achieved in various implicit ways that would be explained below rather than explicit markers such as conjunctive adverbs. So it could be said that this paper is on the implicit markers of text structure.
The paper presents some results received while the text corpus of Ivan Franko is being created. The notion of the structure annotation of text corpus is specified. The important text elements for particular structure annotation of an author text corpus are shown. Such elements as author's definition of genre, author's notes about remaking, dedications, epigraphs, citations, author's signature of work (date and/or place of the work creation, original name or pseudonym), author's and editor's footnotes are described on the basis of Ivan Franko's prose.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.