The study deals with the reference of fictional narrative and the theoretical conceptualization of the reader’s activity. It is a response to a study by the philosopher Peter Koťátko, in which he argues that a narrative fictional text directs our thinking and imagination at a real world. Thereby Peter Koťátko disputes the theory of ontologically independent fictional worlds. The result of the comparison of both approaches is the author’s belief, that there is a tension between Peter Koťátko’s attempt to simplify the fictional reference and the substantial feature of the fictional narrative reader’s activity. The reader has to act in two ways: on one hand he believes, that what he reads really happens, on the other hand he understands that what he reads is a fiction. Constant relating text and reality to each other using the operator “as if“ (Peter Koťátko) rather disturbs the game-like character of the activity (especially when reading non-mimetic texts). On the contrary the theory of fictional worlds (Marie-Laure Ryan, Lubomír Doležel) takes into account two levels of the reader’s activity.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.