Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  TRANSCENDENTAL REDUCTION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Studia theologica
|
2010
|
vol. 12
|
issue 1
38-62
EN
The purpose of this article is to search the possibility of a ground of unconditioned truth and values, on the level of phenomenology. The transcendental reduction is insufficient to fulfill this charge, for she leads in an infinite return of reflecting. Yet, in the opposite way to the reflection, the transcendental subject goes out of itself in the devotion to the transcendent object (finally conceived personally). These two directions of intentionality determine themselves mutually. There is the place of unconditioned truth and values, not to reach in a perception, but in an act of astonishment or a kind of revelation.
Filo-Sofija
|
2007
|
vol. 7
|
issue 7
141-162
EN
This article intends to bring up the very core of Edmund Husserl’s philosophy, it means the issue of the transcendental reduction, which, according to the idea of the creator of phenomenology, could solve the problems like: the correlation between subject and object, the issue of transcendence, and the precision of philosophy as well. The present text is tied only to showing the transcendental reduction, conducted by Husserl by the Cartesian way. This method of doing reduction is the most fundamental, because of the fact that philosopher intends to break the new ground of sure, imperturbable, irreducible and resistant to any doubt base of recognition. Similar searches were conducted by René Descartes. The author shortly describes the issue of the correlation between subject and object in the point of view of George Berkeley and Immanuel Kant; these philosophers concentrated on the pretences of recognition. Edmund Husserl was inspired by their philosophy. Then, author describes the way to the transcendental reduction, the pretence of the “natural world” and concentrates on showing the issue of reduction- the most controversial point in Husserl’s philosophy. The article is finished by the short philosophical meditation, which is the try of realization the theoretical think.
EN
The article is intended to investigate the concept of language as a phenomenon of culture in Max Scheler's phenomenology. Special attention is paid to analysis of this concept in the context of phenomenological reductions problems. The author describes the most important part of Scheler's conception of language, notably his theory of symbols. The role of this conception is defined by differentiation between the latter theory and Husserl's ideas about the place of language in the reductions method. The author argues that Scheler's concept of symbols can get round the obstacles of transcendental and eidetic reductions. Scheler interprets modifications of judgments only as modifications of individual pronouncements, but not as general pronouncements. It is a kind of treatment which has an influence upon the whole phenomenological procedures, as well as upon the practice of phenomenological reductions. All these changes show that phenomenology is also possible as a philosophy with a natural standpoint. The ground of such a view is Max Scheler's concept of language or, to be more precise, his theory of symbols and theory of judgement.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.