Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Triple Helix
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Modern economic thought provides various theories on the best models of socio – economic development. On the one hand, it raises the need to build innovative, competitive economies, on the other enhances great importance of sustainable development, which refers to meet all human needs through regular contact and relationship to the natural environment. Considering the above, the purpose of this article is to answer the question of whether and how the concept of Triple Helix is combined with the concept of sustainable development. Can the development of cooperation within the above mentioned model foster sustainable development processes? Answers to the above question can be found in the analysis of the characteristics and goals of sustainable development model and the Triple Helix. It can be assessed, that these two concepts could complement each other and promote mutual development.
PL
Współczesna myśl ekonomiczna dostarcza wielu teorii dotyczących najlepszych modeli rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego. W szczególności z jednej strony podnosi się konieczność budowy gospodarek innowacyjnych, konkurencyjnych, z drugiej dużą wagę przywiązuje się do aspektów zrównoważonego rozwoju, który dotyczy zaspokojenia wszystkich potrzeb człowieka poprzez prawidłowy kontakt i stosunek do środowiska przyrodniczego. Mając na uwadze powyższe, celem artykułu jest znalezienie odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy i jak założenia koncepcji Triple Helix wpisują się w ideę zrównoważonego rozwój regionalnego, czy rozwój współpracy w ramach powyższego modelu może dynamizować procesy zrównoważonego rozwoju? Odpowiedzi na wyżej postawione pytania, można znaleźć w analizie cech i celów modelu zrównoważonego rozwoju i Triple Helix. Analiza pokazuje, że te dwie koncepcje mogą się wzajemnie uzupełniać i sprzyjać wzajemnemu rozwojowi.
EN
This paper presents an attempt to formalize the concept of the Triple Helix of university-government-industry interactions as a prototype of an innovation ecosystem. Such a formalization is based on game theory principles, methods and models, as well as the methods and instruments of the theory of optimal allocation of resources. The constructed game-theoretic model simulates the phases of R&D, the implementation and commercialization of a new project, as well as the risks and uncertainty in each of these innovation stages.
EN
In this article a problem of congruence of university structure, modes of knowledge production and the G. Beytson’s theory of learning are considered as the research goal. This prob¬lem is considered for the first time. The methodological basis of work is the theoretical-empirical methods of scientific knowledge, including the methods of idealization, modeling and comparison. In the center of consideration there is a university, a unique institution which accumulates in it education, researches (science), and innovation’s production. The structure of university constantly changed according to the requirements of society. The author of this article considers that the university has to represent a modern scientific, educational and industrial complex with the academic kernel and the interdisciplinary project-oriented periphery. This periphery has to include two interuniversity components: profession-oriented modules (POM) and project-innovative fields (PIF). Through these components the university interacts with business. This interaction is promoted by the small innovative enterprises, the scientific-educational centers and other innovative structures which are already created in some countries. Successful innovative activity demands modern modes of knowledge production. Evolution of these forms from the Conception of traditional disciplinary-organized knowledge production (Mode 1) to the Conception of knowledge production «Penta Helix» (Mode 5) is investigated in this article. A widely known model «Triple Helix» of Henry Etzkowitz (Mode 5) is also considered. These modes of knowledge production are correspond to well-known learning levels of Gregory Beytson. Prof. Beytson has predicted the existence of 5 learning levels (from 0 to ΙV), but only three of them (Ι, ΙΙ, ΙΙΙ) are actual for the modern person. Learning Ι is the development and improvement of new receptions and abilities. Learning ΙΙ is a fruitful in the time of fast, sharp changes. It supposes instant reorganization of absolutely other category or a class of actions. Such learning is effective in the time of fast transition to new policy, to new values or priorities. Such learning is rather innovative. Only the solution of the problem of congruence of knowledge production and learning levels will allow university to execute successfully its new mission – innovative.
EN
The cooperation of the three sectors included in the Triple Helix (TH), i.e. science, business and public administration is carried out in varied ways. The course of the relationship is not only affected by the sectors themselves but also by factors specific to the environment in which they operate. The article focuses on the local aspects of the TH model – actors who create it and give it a specific, individualized dimension. At the beginning of deliberations, the authors hypothesized that the formation of Białystok Science and Technology Park contributed to the intensification of cooperation between the three sectors in the city of Bialystok and the incubation of new innovative enterprises. The aim of the study was to determine the local TH model parameters in the City of Bialystok and evaluate the potential of individual actors. In Bialystok, public administration has highest potential within the local TH model. Due to the relatively high degree of integration and concentration of authority in the city it is much easier to carry out long-term innovation policy. The basic problem of business and science turns out to be a low degree of concentration, which hinders the diffusion of knowledge and reduces competitiveness. In Bialystok LGU is the moderator of cooperation between the three sectors – there is a etatistic model. The current local government intervention is supposed to lead to the independence of the two other spheres, through their innovation and increase in competitiveness.
EN
Most countries implement a policy supporting the commercialization of research. There are several institutionalized forms and initiatives supporting research, development and innovation (RDI) transfer between university and business. The research is driven by the question of Polish RDI institutions’ efficiency and effectiveness, while more generally it aims to contribute to a theoretical understanding of the innovation system. The article builds on the economic studies of the National Innovation System (NIS) and Triple Helix Concept, highlighting the need for a structural style study. This is used to create a NIS case study for Poland, and provides an audit of systemic features and issues based on qualitative information, using a particular framework respecting three levels of stakeholders and investment viewpoints. The research has a descriptive but also a normative character.
PL
Większość krajów wdraża politykę wspierającą komercjalizację badań. Istnieje wiele zinstytucjonalizowanych form i inicjatyw wspierających transfer badań, rozwoju i innowacji (RDI) między uniwersytetem a biznesem. Niniejsze opracowanie stawia pytanie o efektywność polskich instytucji badawczo-rozwojowych, bardziej ogólnie zaś – może przyczynić się do lepszego zrozumienia systemu innowacji. Artykuł wykorzystuje koncepcję Narodowego Systemu Innowacji (NSI) i koncepcję potrójnej helisy, podkreślając potrzebę badania struktury organizacyjnej systemu innowacji. Opracowanie przedstawia studium przypadku NSI dla Polski i umożliwa przeprowadzenie swoistego audytu struktur organizacyjnych wspierających transfer badań, rozwoju i innowacji. Badanie oparte jest na informacjach jakościowych według schematu uwzględniającego trzy poziomy interesariuszy i trzy perspektywy inwestycyjne. Badania mają charakter opisowy, ale także normatywny.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.