Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  UNIDROIT
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Projekt "Digitální aktiva a soukromé právo". Mezinárodní organizace UNIDROIT vychází z návrhu České republiky

100%
Pauknerová M.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2022
|
vol. 161
|
issue 2
156-165
EN
This information deals with the project on Digital assets and private law which is currently being prepared in the framework of UNIDROIT in cooperation with UNCITRAL, the Czech Republic was one of important initiators of this project. The UNIDROIT Exploratory Working Group is composed of experts selected for their expertise in the field of property law, secured transactions, and digital technology and the law, representing the world’s different systems, common law and civil law. The author describes the history of the project and the relevant sources, the scope of the project and definitions of digital assets and control, pointing out on problems of translation into Czech. She introduces the outline of the project, conceived as a set of principles with commentary and illustrations. The project should be finalised in 2022–2023 and adopted in 2023.
CS
Informace je věnována projektu Digitální aktiva a soukromé právo, který je v současné době připravován v rámci UNIDROIT ve spolupráci s UNCITRAL. Jedním z důležitých iniciátorů tohoto projektu byla Česká republika. Pracovní skupina UNIDROIT je složena z expertů v oblasti majetkového práva, zajištěných transakcí a právní regulace digitálních technologií, kteří reprezentují různé právní systémy v rámci common law a civilního práva. Autorka popisuje historii projektu a relevantní zdroje, rozsah projektu a obsahové vymezení digitálních aktiv a kontroly, s poukazem na určité problémy vznikající při překladu do češtiny. Uvádí nástin projektu, který je pojat jako soubor principů s komentářem a ilustracemi na konkrétních příkladech. Projekt by měl být finalizován v letech 2022–2023 a přijat v roce 2023.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The UNIDROIT Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment as the direction for security rights regulations in the COVID-19 economy

99%
Tomczak T.
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
|
2022
|
vol. 37
145-155
EN
In this article some features of the Cape Town Convention security interest were juxtaposed with some features of the Polish registered pledge. The aim of such research was to answer the question which of these two instruments is better adjusted to the COVID-19 economy. On the basis of such analysis, a conclusion was made that the Cape Town Convention security interest constitutes a more flexible security right and therefore one which is better adjusted to the COVID-19 economy. In the opinion of the author, the Cape Town Convention security interest shall constitute the direction in which the Polish security rights, especially in B2B relations, should go. The research was based on an analysis of the laws in force and a comparative analysis.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Non-State Law in International Commercial Arbitration

71%
König M.
Polish Yearbook of International Law
|
2015
|
vol. 35
265-292
EN
The feature that most attracts private parties from different states to referring their dispute to an arbitral tribunal is the flexibility of the procedure. However, the differences between arbitration and court litigation are not only procedural, but they concern the substance of the parties’ cases. This is because in the realm of international arbitration the law applicable to the merits of the case is determined according to other provisions than the statutory conflict of laws rules. Depending on the arbitration law of the seat, the entire private international law statute can be captured in a single provision – “absent the parties’ choice, the arbitral tribunal shall apply the rules of law which it determines to be appropriate”. It follows that arbitral tribunals, unlike state courts, are not bound by the conflict of laws rules of the forum. What’s more, the merits of a dispute submitted to arbitration may be governed not only by some national body of law (e.g. the Polish Civil Code) but also by a non-state, non-national set of provisions – “rules of law” (e.g. the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts). The aim of this article is to analyze how the parties and tribunals may make use of their autonomy in determining the law applicable to a dispute. Furthermore it examines whether there are any limits thereto in light of the Rome I Regulation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.