Search results

1

What Did Shakespeare Know About Copernicanism?

100%

Weber A. S.

Romanian Journal of English Studies

|

2012

|

vol. 9

|

issue 1

351-365

EN

This contribution examines Shakespeare’s knowledge of the cosmological theories of Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) as well as recent claims that Shakespeare possessed specialized knowledge of technical astronomy.

2

Wokół daty wystawienia dyplomu super complemento matrimonii Jadwigi Andegaweńskiej i Wilhelma Habsburga

86%

Wróbel D.

Historia Slavorum Occidentis

|

2020

|

issue 1 (24)

86-97

EN

This article presents the circumstances accompanying two academic positions on the date of a document issued in Buda on 28 July 1385 with respect to the marriage between Hedwig of Anjou and William, Duke of Austria. The document’s data of 1384 has been subjected to critique.

3

В. Шекспір у вимірах українського необароко: перекладацькі стратегії Т. Осьмачки

72%

Дроздовський Д.

Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie

|

2016

|

vol. 3

121-133

EN

The author of the present article analyses the Neo-Baroque strategies employed by Todos’ Os’machka in his translation of Shakespeare’s Henry IV and Macbeth. A translation process in the Ukrainian emigration literature of the 1940s–1960s was oriented toward the explication of the Neo-Baroque stylistic and rhetoric figures (paronymic attraction, lexical dissemination, etc.) in representing and transforming Shakespearean imagery in the Ukrainian language. The author attempts to analyse the reception of Shakespeare in the translations by Os’machka, to define the nature of the Neo-Baroque translation method. Translations of Shakespeare played an important role in the formation of the new stylistic features of the Ukrainian language. Moreover, the Ukrainian reception of Shakespeare in the discourse of the Ukrainian emigration literature of the 1940s–1960s has some Baroque and Neo-Baroque forms that influenced in a special way the Ukrainian Shakespearean discourse.

4

Sidneyova Obrana básnictví jako strategie vyrovnání s antickými a kontinentálními vzory

58%

Kastnerová M.

Svět literatury – Časopis pro novodobé literatury (World of Literature – Journal for Modern Literatures)

|

2015

|

vol. 51

49-66

EN

The study deals with the main tenets of Philip Sidney’s poetics on the basis of his The Defence of Poesy and his poetry (mainly Astrophil and Stella) in the context of Elizabethan considerations of the classical aesthetic concepts (especially that of Aristotle and Horace) and some of the Renaissance continental examples. Sidney’s Defence of Poesy represents a fundamental step in establishing poetry as the creator of its own world, its so–called second nature, and points out the poetry’s ability to create figures and imitate reality; thus the main value of poetry lies in creating clear rhetorical images of moral truth. So Sidney’s poetics plays an important role in establishing English poetry as a device of the national cultural and social independence.

5

Possible, impossible. Difficult Norwid in difficult Norwid studies

44%

Samsel K.

Studia Norwidiana

|

2017

|

vol. 35 English Version

219-248

PL

Tom Trudny Norwid jest nie tylko próbą stworzenia „monografii niemożliwej”, lecz także ważnym, bo przekrojowym dokumentem ewolucji polskiej norwidologii (być może właśnie ta, a nie inna problematyka książki ów interesujący horyzont szczególnie uprzystępniała). Skutkiem tego – analizowany tu zbiór tekstów domaga się niejako dwóch dróg odczytywania i podlega tak samo dwóm równoległym ścieżkom interpretacyjnym. Jedna została wyznaczona przez temat całości tomu, druga realizowana jest mimowolnie, zwłaszcza w toku omawiania dyskusyjnych kwestii w obrębie dyscypliny. Ta druga wydała się autorowi niniejszego omówienia równie pasjonująca, co pierwsza. Stąd też jego próba syntetycznego połączenia obu interesów tej książki, choćby w ramach podtytułu niniejszego studium – hasła „trudnego Norwida trudnej norwidologii”.

EN

The volume Trudny Norwid [Difficult Norwid] marks not only an attempt to create an “impossible monograph” but also an important, large-scale record of the evolution of Norwid Studies in Poland (perhaps it is exactly this and not the other issues addressed in the book that made this interesting perspective particularly accessible). As a result, the collection of texts examined here requires at least two ways of reading and is subject to the same two parallel interpretive paths. One of these was defined by the subject of the entire volume, while the other one is performed involuntarily, in particular in the course of discussing issues that are disputable in the discipline. The author of this review found the second interpretive path as exciting as the first, hence this attempt to synthesise the two interests of the book, if only under the heading of this study – the headword “difficult Norwid in difficult Norwid Studies”.

Refine search results

1 Historia Slavorum Occidentis

1 Romanian Journal of English Studies

1 Studia Norwidiana

1 Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie

1 Svět literatury – Časopis pro novodobé literatury (World of Literature – Journal for Modern Literatures)

1 Kastnerová M.

1 Samsel K.

1 Weber A. S.

1 Wróbel D.

1 Дроздовський Д.

2 2020

1 2016

1 2015

1 2012

What Did Shakespeare Know About Copernicanism?

Wokół daty wystawienia dyplomu super complemento matrimonii Jadwigi Andegaweńskiej i Wilhelma Habsburga

В. Шекспір у вимірах українського необароко: перекладацькі стратегії Т. Осьмачки

Sidneyova Obrana básnictví jako strategie vyrovnání s antickými a kontinentálními vzory

Possible, impossible. Difficult Norwid in difficult Norwid studies