Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Yuval Noah Harari
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
The authors discuss Yuval Noah Harari’s concept of dataism, which is part of a wider stream of debate on the future of civilization. Depending on the analytical perspective and the type of narration, dataism has been characterized as a kind of faith, an ideology, a worldview, or a set of (conscious) attitudes for which information is a kind of arche. The popularizer of the concept, the anthropologist Yuval Harari, argues that acts of dataism are a useful praxis of the twenty-first century, consisting in the deliberate – but also partly involuntary – entrusting of one’s life affairs (and not only) to algorithms that process data from popular digital devices such as a smartphone. Among the many significant effects thors point to changes in the spheres of work and capital which to produce a profound political and moral revolution.
EN
Using examples from popular culture and history, the author speculates on the reasons and possible solutions to the crisis of trust in academia, especially along the line dividing specialists from non-specialists. The article begins with two case studies (of Yuval Noah Harari and Gustave Le Bon) that highlight the problem of conscious or otherwise data manipulation and the intention behind it. In the second part of the article, a broader approach is adopted to the matters of ethics of research and especially the crucial issue of the awareness (or lack thereof) of self-limitations and biases of which perhaps no academic is free. The article ends with the assertion that rather than individual researchers, we should trust in the academic process of the never-ending peer review.
PL
Na podstawie przykładów zaczerpniętych z kultury popularnej i historii autorka spekuluje na temat przyczyn i możliwych rozwiązań kryzysu zaufania do środowiska akademickiego, zwłaszcza wzdłuż osi specjaliści-niespecjaliści. Artykuł rozpoczyna się od dwóch studiów przypadku (Yuvala Noaha Harariego i Gustave'a Le Bona), które podkreślają problem świadomej lub nieświadomej manipulacji danymi i intencji, która za tym stoi. W drugiej części artykułu podjęto szersze rozważania na temat zagadnień etyki badań, a zwłaszcza kluczowej kwestii świadomości (lub jej braku) samoograniczeń i uprzedzeń, od których być może żaden naukowiec nie jest wolny. Artykuł kończy się stwierdzeniem, że zamiast indywidualnym badaczom, powinniśmy ufać akademickiemu procesowi niekończącej się recenzji (peer review).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.