Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  a person performing a public function
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The confl ict between the right to privacy and transparency of public information is inevitable, and the case law of the Polish courts administration in this regard clearly indicates the primacy of transparency of the functioning of public authorities and persons holding public offi ce. However, this leads to mindless — and in most cases, deprived of a higher purpose — invasion of privacy of public officials and other employees of the public sector. In extreme cases, it may also jeopardize the smooth operation of the state and the safety of its offi cers distorting the purpose and nature of this form of social control. The article discusses the current posts of Polish administrative courts in regard of the confl ict of right to public information and the right to privacy.
EN
The subject matter of the commentary focuses on the issue of the functional and grammatical interpretation of the notion of ‘a person perform-ing a public function’, which, in the author’s opinion, does not directly refer to the public offi cer referred to in Article 115(13) of the Act of 6 June 1997 Penal Code. The author highlights the unjustifi ed perception of a person performing a public function by the Polish justice system as being viewed as a public offi cer as defi ned in Article 115(13) of the Penal Code. The main arguments focus on the risks arising from an overly broad in-terpretation of the concept of a person performing a public function. In fact, the lack of a defi ned set of persons performing public functions may give rise to a malfunction on the part of the entity obliged to make public informa-tion available, and thus to the constitutional principle of limiting the right to public information on the grounds of privacy.The fi nal part of the commentary is a refl ection on making public infor-mation available under the provisions of the Act of 15 July 2011 on Control in Government Administration, and a starting point for a broader discussion on the need to amend the current legal system.
3
51%
PL
Autor czyni rozważania na temat zakresu normatywnego przestępstwa nadużycia władzy, rozpoczynając analizę od ujęcia art. 231 k.k. w perspektywie kodeksów karnych z 1932 i 1969 r. Zauważa, że to nie dobro prawne odgrywa najistotniejszą rolę przy analizie przestępstw z rozdziału XXIX kodeksu karnego z 1997 r., ale definicje zawarte w tzw. słowniczku ustawowym. Dokonuje ponadto wykładni wyrażeń „pracownik samorządu terytorialnego”, „innego organu państwowego” oraz „innej instytucji państwowej”, postulując także odpowiednie zmiany w zakresie kręgu podmiotów przestępstwa nadużycia władzy, w tym m.in. uzupełnienie definicji „funkcjonariusza publicznego” o znamię „dysponowania środkami publicznymi”.
EN
The author makes a reflection on the normative content of the crime of abuse of power starting from the analysis of the art. 231 of Criminal Code in the perspective of the Criminal Codes from 1932 and 1969. He notes that it is not the legal interests playing a central role in the analysis of the crime in chapter XXIX of Criminal Code, but the definitions contained in the so-called legal dictionary. Moreover, he also interprets the term ‘employee of local government’, ‘other state authority’ and ‘the other state institution’, postulating also the corresponding changes in the area of subjects of crime of abuse of power, including supplementing the definition of a public official by an element of disposal of a public funds.
RU
Автор рассматривает перечень нормативных преступлений в злоупотреблении властью, начиная с анализа ст. 231 к.к. в перспективе уголовных кодексов от 1932 и 1969 гг. Он отмечает, что это не правовые интересы играют центральную роль в анализе преступлений из главы XXIX Уголовного кодекса от 1997 г., но определения содержащиеся в так называемых. правовых словарях. Также представляет термины „работник территориального самоуправления”, „другой государственный орган” и „другое государственное учреждение”, постулируя также относительные изменения в ряде субъектов преступления в злоупотреблении властью, в том числе дополнить определение „публичного должностного лица” выражением „распоряжение государственными средствами”.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.