Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  absolutność
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Hans Wagner jako neoneokantysta

100%
Pietras A.
Folia Philosophica
|
2018
|
vol. 39
EN
The aim of the paper is to briefly present the philosophy of Hans Wagner (1917-2000) as belonging to the last phase of the development of the German transcendental philosophy. Hans Wagner’s philosophy is presented as an attempt to synthesize earlier positions developed on the basis of this tradition, namely the synthesis of: (a) neo-Kantianism with post-neo-Kantianism, (b) Kant's philosophy with Hegel's philosophy, (c) neo-Kantian transcendentalism with Husserl's transcendentalism, (d) the philosophy of transcendental subject (Kant, neo-Kantianism, phenomenology) with the philosophy of empirical subject (Hönigswald, Heidegger, Sartre). The main theoretical figure of Hans Wagner’s philosophy is the problem of two aspects of human thinking: its absoluteness and finiteness. According to Wagner development of the philosophical reflection, which we can observe on the example of the evolution of - originating from Kant - transcendental philosophy, leads to an explanation of the possibility to reconcile these two aspects of human thinking, and thus to answer the very question: how is it possible that our thinking can be both absolute and finished, and what are the consequences of this fact for the status of all cultural products of human thinking, such as: science, morality or law.
PL
Celem artykułu jest krótkie przedstawienie filozofii Hansa Wagnera (1917-2000) jako należącej do ostatniej fazy rozwoju tradycji niemieckiej filozofii transcendentalnej. Filozofia Wagnera przedstawiona zostaje jako próba syntezy wcześniejszych stanowisk rozwiniętych na gruncie tej tradycji, a mianowicie jako synteza: (a) neokantyzmu z postneokantyzmem, (b) filozofii Kanta z filozofią Hegla, (c) transcendentalizmu neokantystów z transcendentalizmem Husserla, (d) filozofii podmiotu transcendentalnego (Kant, neokantyzm, fenomenologia) z filozofią podmiotu konkretnego (Hönigswald, Heidegger, Sartre). Podstawową figurę teoretyczną filozofii Hansa Wagnera stanowi problem dwuaspektowości myślenia ludzkiego: jego absolutności i skończoność zarazem. Zdaniem Wagnera rozwój refleksji filozoficznej, który obserwujemy na przykładzie ewolucji pochodzącej od Kanta tradycji filozofii transcendentalnej, prowadzi do wyjaśnienia możliwości pogodzenia tych dwóch aspektów ludzkiego myślenia, a więc do odpowiedzi na pytanie: jak to możliwe, że nasze myślenie może być jednocześnie absolutne i skończone, a także – jakie są tego konsekwencje dla statusu wszystkich kulturowych wytworów ludzkiego myślenia, takich jak: nauka, moralność czy prawo. 
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pluralistyczny model prawdy

100%
Skakuj M.
Roczniki Teologii Fundamentalnej i Religiologii
|
2013
|
vol. 5
177-200
EN
On the grounds of the analysis made by the author of the elaboration one can notice a strong tendency to the relativisation of truth performing in the context of the pluralist theology of religion. Representatives of the aforementioned trend want to question the objective character of truth. Such actions are aimed at leading to the statement that all religions are equally exceptional. To clearly understand the theses of pluralists, philosophical foundations of the pluralist theology of religion have been depicted. It must be stated that pluralists use philosophical notions selectively and instrumentally, which makes it possible to reach desirable conclusions. The contestation of the absolute and objective character of truth has serious consequences and exerts an influence upon the understanding of interreligious dialogue. The problem of resignation from one's own religious identity appears. Defending themselves against such an accusation, pluralists introduce the concept of orthopraxis as the criterion of truth. Consequently, the determinant of truth is its ability to realize itself in the proper demeanour. Views presented in the pluralist theology of religion constitute a serious reproach to Christian truth as well as biblical truth.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.