Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  administrative coercion
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Pojęcie postępowania egzekucyjnego w administracji a pojęcie egzekucji administracyjnej

100%
Klat-Wertelecka L.
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
|
2011
|
vol. IX
11-24
EN
Execution proceeding and execution are two basic terms of the execution law. Administrative proceeding and administrative execution are terms with different notional ranges. An execution proceeding is a legally organized series of actions performed by an execution organ and other subjects, which are aimed at making real the concrete legal norm, established in the act that constitutes the basis for execution (warrant of execution), with application of legal means of enforcement. Execution means an application, by relevant execution organs, of means of state-sanctioned enforcement in order to fulfill the duty defined in the warrant of execution. Execution makes the executive stage in execution proceeding in administration. The notion “execution proceeding” points to the aspect of the law-suit character of applying the execution enforcement, whereas that of “administrative execution” – to its material aspect.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Regulation of Administrative Fines in the Polish Code of Administrative Procedure

72%
Stankiewicz R.
Studia Iuridica
|
2019
|
vol. 82
263-273
EN
This article presents the problems of administrative fines in the Code of Administrative Procedure. These solutions were introduced to this act in 2017. The amendment to the Code of Administrative Procedure provided for the introduction of a new section (Section VIa), the provisions of which lay down the rules for imposing administrative penalties, ie penalties, cases justifying waiving the imposition of a penalty and granting the public administration authority the prescription, limitation of the imposition and enforcement of the penalty, and also the rules of postponement, payment in installments and cancellation of penalties. This article presents only selected issues of the regulation of imposing administrative fines in the Code of Administrative Procedure.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Charakter prawny odpowiedzialności za nieszczepienie dziecka

72%
Czechowicz S.
Studia Prawnicze KUL
|
2021
|
issue 2
267-282
EN
Mandatory vaccinations are the basis for numerous discussions and controversies not only among the public, but also among sociologists, epidemiologists and lawyers. The obligation to undergo vaccinations concerns primarily children, so it will be performed by the legal or factual guardians of the minor. In recent years, there has been an increase in the proportion of children not vaccinated. Avoiding the obligation to vaccinate is currently an increasing social and legal problem. This article is devoted to the issue of responsibility for evasion of compulsory vaccination in terms of criminal law dogma. The demonstrated links between the activity of public administration and the contemporary law of offence, which penalizes the evasion of the obligation to vaccinate, will help to understand the multi-faceted structure of mutual relations between the currently separated branches of law.This highlights the mixed nature of the responsibility for not carrying out mandatory preventive vaccination.  
PL
Obowiązkowe szczepienia ochronne stanowią podłoże rozlicznych dyskusji i kontrowersji nie tylko wśród społeczeństwa, ale także w środowisku socjologów, epidemiologów, ale także prawników. Obowiązek poddawania się szczepieniom dotyczy przede wszystkim dzieci, a więc jego wykonanie spoczywać będzie na prawnych lub faktycznych opiekunach małoletniego. W ostatnich latach odnotowuje się wzrost odsetka liczby niezaszczepionych dzieci. Uchylanie się od obowiązku szczepień obecnie stanowi coraz większy problem społeczny i prawny. Niniejszy artykuł jest poświęcony problematyce odpowiedzialności za uchylanie się od obowiązkowych szczepień ochronnych w ujęciu dogmatyki prawa karnego sensu largo. Wykazane związki pomiędzy działalnością administracji publicznej a współczesnym prawem wykroczeń, które penalizuje uchylanie się od obowiązku szczepień pomogą zrozumieć wielopłaszczyznową strukturę wzajemnych zależności pomiędzy aktualnie wyodrębnionymi gałęziami prawa. Tym samym uwypuklając mieszany charakter odpowiedzialności za nie wykonywanie obowiązkowych szczepień ochronnych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.