Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  administrative punishment
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

A new system and legal regulation of administrative punishment in the Czech Republic

100%
Potěšil L.
Prawo
|
2019
|
issue 327
311-324
EN
This paper focuses on the new legal regulation that came into effect on 1.07.2017. This represents a relatively new approach to punishment realized by the administrative bodies. The new legal regulation has changed the system of administrative delicts itself as well as practice of administrative bodies. Not only in Poland, where there was a newly-adopted new legal regulation in the Administrative Code (KPA), but also in the Czech Republic, we can see how the phenomenon of administrative punishment is becoming important and is an important part of the functioning of public administration. This paper would like to analyze important changes as well as some questions that the new legal regulation in the Czech Republic has brought.
2
Content available remote

Work performance outside the employment relationship as an administrative offence and its punishment in the Czech Republic

88%
Benešová R.
Data a výzkum - SDA Info (Data and Research - SDA Info)
|
2023
|
vol. 13
|
issue 3
276-295
EN
The topic of this article is illegal employment under Section 5(e)(1) of Act No. 435/2004 Coll., on Employment, as amended, and its punishment in the Czech Republic. It deals exclusively with the fulfilment of the definition of illegal employment through the performance of work outside the employment relationship, i.e. situations where dependent work is either concealed, performed without a validly concluded employment contract or performed on a trial basis. The author objects to connect the employment area with the area of administrative punishment and to provide coherent knowledge on illegal work and its detecting and combating in the Czech territory. Hence, the article provides a detailed analysis of the current legal regulation of illegal work and links its wording with selected case law, thus creating a comprehensive overview of this issue.
3
Content available remote

Česká cesta adaptace obecného nařízení aneb hmotněprávní exempce přestupků podle zákona o zpracování osobních údajů

51%
Matejka J., Mates P.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2021
|
vol. 160
|
issue 10
843-853
EN
The need for effective sanctioning of the infringements which amount to administrative offenses in the field of personal data protection arises primarily from EU law, which is based on the requirement of an effective threat of sanctions in the form of effet utile. The imposed sanctions must therefore have a sufficiently deterrent effect, both in terms of possible recidivism on the part of the offender himself and in terms of other entities. However, the Czech legislator has chosen a different path for some entities (public authorities and public entities), which, on the basis of the Adaptation Act, leads to the obligation of the supervisory authority to waive administrative sanctions for these privileged entities without further ado. Although the fact that some categories of entities have different procedural or substantive regimes can generally be accepted, in the present case the legislator chose a problematic method of implementation (adaptation), which in essence completely misses the intended purpose of the EU personal data protection system, and in addition to entities that are usually the largest controllers of personal data in the Czech Republic. The article thus deals with related aspects and consequences of this erroneous adaptation, whether it is the fulfillment of the principle of equality and non-discrimination, the principles of administrative punishment, as well as aspects of indirect public support in competition and other related issues. Scholars are critical of this adaptation of regulation, concluding that the chosen method of adaptation creates strong unconstitutional inequality, leads to indirect public support in competition relations and at the same time does not meet other parameters imposed by national and EU law on this regulation.
CS
Nutnost účinně sankcionovat protiprávní jednání naplňující skutkové podstaty správních deliktů v oblasti ochrany osobních údajů vyplývá pro Českou republiku primárně z unijního práva, které stojí na požadavku efektivní hrozby sankcí v podobě užitečného účinku (effet utile). Udělované sankce tak musí mít dostatečně odrazující účinek, a to jak z hlediska případné recidivy ze strany samotného delikventa, tak i z hlediska ostatních subjektů. Český zákonodárce však u některých subjektů (orgány veřejné moci a veřejné subjekty) zvolil jinou cestu, která na základě adaptačního zákona vede k povinnosti dozorového orgánu od správní sankce u těchto privilegovaných subjektů bez dalšího upustit. Tento způsob implementace (adaptace) se ve své podstatě míjí se sledovaným účelem unijního systému ochrany osobních údajů, a to navíc u subjektů, které představují zpravidla největší správce osobních údajů v České republice. Článek se tak zabývá souvisejícími aspekty a důsledky této chybné adaptace, ať již jde o naplňování principu rovnosti a nediskriminace, principy správního trestání, či o aspekty nepřímé veřejné podpory v hospodářské soutěži a další související otázky. Autoři se k této adaptační úpravě staví kriticky, přičemž dovozují, že zvolený způsob adaptace zakládá silnou protiústavní nerovnost, v soutěžních vztazích pak vede k nepřímé veřejné podpoře a současně nesplňuje další parametry, jež na tuto úpravu klade vnitrostátní a unijní právo.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.