Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  agonizm
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article contains the thesis that in political science theories a scientific, ideological and philosophical components are so fused that it is impossible to separate them completely. For this reason, the ideological content not only does not undermine the cognitive value of theoretical argument, but even contributes to it — if the relevant criteria are metI think, that the metatheoretical optics is the most appropriate approach to analyse these criteria. It allows not only to describe given theory, but also enables more problematic de­construction of its conditions and cognitive status. In this article the analysis of this type is presented on the example of Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic conflict theory by taking into consideration three following criteria. First, the ontological and epistemological assumptions of this theory are explained. Secondly, vivisection of the structures and forms of reasoning peculiar to the agonistic paradigm is conducted, followed by the examination of the paradigm’s presence in the scientific discourse. Thirdly, the approaches which are both polemical and supportive for the Mouffe’s theory, but representing different intellectual and ideological circles, are presented.
EN
The purpose of this article is to rethink the thesis claiming a non-agonistic character of Polish Holocaust Studies. The author, using Chantal Mouffe’s agonism theory, outlines the model of agonism and then applies it to literary studies and confronts the concept with affirmative humanism of Ewa Domańska. Non-agonistic structure of Holocaust studies in Poland turns out to be their advantage over studies conducted in Europe and in the world, especially those of post-humanistic variety. Two analysed examples of polemics of writers and literary scholars show that the concept of agon should be re-evaluated because it often leads to the weakening of the subject of science and scientific discourse.
PL
Celem artykułu jest przedyskutowanie tezy o nieagonistyczym charakterze polskich Holocaust studies w ich aspekcie literaturoznawczym. Autorka, korzystając z teorii agonizmu Chantal Mouffe, zarysowuje model agonizmu, by następnie odnieść go do literaturoznawstwa i skonfrontować z koncepcją humanistyki afirmatywnej Ewy Domańskiej. Nieagonistyczna struktura studiów nad Holokaustem w Polsce okazuje się ich potencjalną przewagą nad studiami prowadzonymi w Europie i na świecie, zwłaszcza w ich odmianie posthumanistycznej. Dwa przeanalizowane przykłady polemik pisarzy i literaturoznawców pokazują natomiast, że pojęcie agonu powinno ulec przewartościowaniu i krytycznej ocenie jako to, które często prowadzi do osłabienia podmiotu nauki oraz dyskursu naukowego.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.